Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 15:9:211-229.
doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S112254. eCollection 2017.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of abobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of cervical dystonia in the United Kingdom

Affiliations

Cost-effectiveness analysis of abobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of cervical dystonia in the United Kingdom

Madhusubramanian Muthukumar et al. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. .

Abstract

Background: Cervical dystonia (CD) involves painful involuntary contraction of the neck and shoulder muscles and abnormal posture in middle-aged adults. Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) is effective in treating CD but little is known about its associated cost-effectiveness.

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of abobotulinumtoxinA for treating CD from the UK payer perspective.

Methods: A Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of abobotulinum-toxinA versus best supportive care (BSC) in CD, with a lifetime horizon and health states for response, nonresponse, secondary nonresponse, and BSC in patients with CD (mean age: 53 years; 37% male). Clinical improvement measured using Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) was mapped to utility using data from a randomized trial of abobotulinumtoxinA. Health care resource use, costs, and other inputs were from the British National Formulary, Personal Social Services Research Unit, published literature, or expert opinion. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum.

Results: In the base case, the incremental lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained from abobotulinumtoxinA arm versus BSC was 0.253 per patient, whereas the incremental cost was £7,160, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £30,468 per QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that these results were sensitive to the proportion of responders to abobotulinumtoxinA at first injection, duration between injections, the number of reinjections allowed among primary nonresponders, and any difference in baseline TWSTRS value between the BSC and abobotulinumtoxinA arms. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that abobotulinumtoxinA was cost-effective 46% and 49% of times at thresholds of £20,000 and £30,000 per QALY, respectively. Scenarios are considered including vial-sharing, productivity losses, secondary response/nonresponse at subsequent injections, 5-year time horizon, and alternative reinjection intervals for BoNT-As produced ICERs ranging from cost-saving to £40,777 per QALY, versus BSC.

Conclusion: AbobotulinumtoxinA was found to be cost-effective in treating adults with CD, at acceptable willingness-to-pay thresholds in the UK.

Keywords: abobotulinumtoxinA; botulinum neurotoxin type A; cervical dystonia; cost-effectiveness analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure MM, SA, and KD are employees of Evidera Inc., which received consultancy fees to conduct the research from Ipsen Pharma. JD and SG are both full-time employees of Ipsen Pharma. TH has received consultancy fees from Ipsen Pharma for work relating to Spasticity management TH has also received honoraria for lectures delivered from Merz and Allergan. Ipsen Pharma did not have any influence on the interpretation of data as well as the final conclusions drawn. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Model structure. Notes: *Level of response is based on average change of TWSTRS from baseline in the three groups from trial reanalysis. TWSTRS and quality of life are tracked for each health state. All patients at any state are at risk of death. Abbreviations: BSC, best supportive care; TWSTRS, Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphical representation of linkage between utility and TWSTRS estimated from analysis of abobotulinumtoxinA trial. Data extrapolated from a previous study. Notes: The line represents the best fit to the available data given by the blue points showing reduced utility with higher TWSTRS total score. Abbreviation: TWSTRS, Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cost-effectiveness planes of incremental costs per QALY of abobotulinumtoxinA versus BSC. Abbreviation: BSC, best supportive care; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves of abobotulinumtoxinA and BSC without toxins injections. Abbreviation: BSC, best supportive care.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Truong D, Brodsky M, Lew M, et al. Global dysport cervical dystonia study group Long-term efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) in cervical dystonia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010;16(5):316–323. - PubMed
    1. Electronic medicines compendium (eMC) Dysport® 300 units, Dys-port® 500 units, summary of product characteristics. [Accessed January 2016]. Available from: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/870.
    1. Kessler KR, Skutta M, Benecke R. Long-term treatment of cervical dystonia with botulinum toxin A: efficacy, safety, and antibody frequency. German Dystonia study group. J Neurol. 1999;246(4):265–274. - PubMed
    1. Electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) Bortox® 100 units, Bortox® 50 units, Summary of Product Characteristics. [Accessed January 2016]. Available from: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/112; https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/22562; https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/20564.
    1. Electronic medicines compendium (eMC) Xeomin® 100 units, Xeo-min® 50 units, summary of product characteristics. [Accessed January 2016]. Available from: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/20666; https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/24582.