Anesthesia and perioperative pain management during cardiac electronic device implantation
- PMID: 28458575
- PMCID: PMC5402996
- DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S132241
Anesthesia and perioperative pain management during cardiac electronic device implantation
Abstract
Background: The degree of pain caused by the implantation of cardiac electronic devices (CEDs) and the type of anesthesia or perioperative pain management used with the procedure have been insufficiently studied. The aim of this study was to analyze perioperative pain management, as well as intensity and location of pain among patients undergoing implantation of CED, and to compare the practice with published guidelines.
Patients and methods: This was a combined retrospective and prospective study conducted at the tertiary hospital, University Hospital Split, Croatia. The sample included 372 patients who underwent CED implantation. Perioperative pain management was analyzed retrospectively in 321 patients who underwent CED implantation during 2014. In a prospective study, intensity and location of pain before, during, and after the procedure were measured by using a numerical rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10 in 51 patients at the same institution from November 2014 to August 2015.
Results: A quarter of patients received analgesia or sedation before surgery. All the patients received local lidocaine anesthesia. After surgery, 31% of patients received pain medication or sedation. The highest pain intensity was observed during CED implantation with the highest NRS pain score being 8. Some patients reported severe pain (NRS >5) also at 1, 3, 6, 8, and 24 hours after surgery. The most common pain locations were surgical site, shoulder, and chest. Adherence to guidelines for acute perioperative pain management was insufficient.
Conclusion: Patients may experience severe pain during and after CED implantation. Perioperative pain management was suboptimal, and higher doses of sedation and intensive analgesia are required. Guidelines for acute perioperative pain management and anesthesia during CED implantation should be developed.
Keywords: analgesics; cardiac electronic devices; guidelines; pain intensity; perioperative pain management; postoperative pain.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Analysis of perioperative pain management in vascular surgery indicates that practice does not adhere with guidelines: a retrospective cross-sectional study.J Pain Res. 2017 Jan 17;10:203-209. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S123894. eCollection 2017. J Pain Res. 2017. PMID: 28176903 Free PMC article.
-
Postoperative Pain Management after Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Surgical Treatment: Comparing Practice with Guidelines.Acta Clin Croat. 2017 Sep;56(3):422-427. doi: 10.20471/acc.2017.56.03.11. Acta Clin Croat. 2017. PMID: 29479910
-
A prospective randomized study to analyze the efficacy of balanced pre-emptive analgesia in spine surgery.Spine J. 2019 Apr;19(4):569-577. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 22. Spine J. 2019. PMID: 30359764 Clinical Trial.
-
[Transcutaneous aortic valve implantation: Anesthetic and perioperative management].Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2011 Oct;30(10):734-42. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 Jun 30. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2011. PMID: 21723077 Review. French.
-
[Perioperative analgesia in urology and potential influence of anesthesia on oncologic outcomes of surgery].Prog Urol. 2012 Jul;22(9):503-9. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2012.04.006. Epub 2012 May 12. Prog Urol. 2012. PMID: 22732641 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Analgesic Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Pecs II Block in Central Venous Port Catheter Implantation.J Pain Res. 2020 May 22;13:1185-1191. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S258692. eCollection 2020. J Pain Res. 2020. PMID: 32547181 Free PMC article.
-
Postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia improves pain management after subcutaneous implantable defibrillator implantation.J Arrhythm. 2024 Feb 28;40(2):349-355. doi: 10.1002/joa3.13006. eCollection 2024 Apr. J Arrhythm. 2024. PMID: 38586843 Free PMC article.
-
What is Known About Early Mobilisation After Cardiac Electronic Device Implant? A Scoping Review.Med Devices (Auckl). 2024 Dec 16;17:513-524. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S493641. eCollection 2024. Med Devices (Auckl). 2024. PMID: 39713794 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia in Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: An Observational Study.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 28;61(6):1001. doi: 10.3390/medicina61061001. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40572689 Free PMC article.
-
Cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery (CAGE CUP): study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 27;8(6):e020714. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020714. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29950464 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Herce B, Nazeyrollas P, Lesaffre F, et al. Risk factors for infection of implantable cardiac devices: data from a registry of 2496 patients. Europace. 2013;15(1):66–70. - PubMed
-
- Hill PE. Complications of permanent transvenous cardiac pacing: a 14-year review of all transvenous pacemakers inserted at one community hospital. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1987;10(3 Pt 1):564–570. - PubMed
-
- Gadler F, Valzania C, Linde C. Current use of implantable electrical devices in Sweden: data from the Swedish pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry. Europace. 2015;17(1):69–77. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources