Cost-effectiveness of short-term neurosurgical missions relative to other surgical specialties
- PMID: 28458951
- PMCID: PMC5369257
- DOI: 10.4103/sni.sni_199_16
Cost-effectiveness of short-term neurosurgical missions relative to other surgical specialties
Abstract
Background: Short-term surgical relief efforts have helped close some gaps in the provision of surgical care in remote settings. We reviewed the published literature on short-term surgical missions to compare their cost-effectiveness across subspecialties.
Methods: PubMed was searched using the algorithm ["cost-effectiveness" AND "surgery" AND ("mission" OR "volunteer")]. Articles detailing the cost-effectiveness of short-term surgical missions in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) were included. Only direct mission costs were considered, and all costs were converted into 2014 USD.
Results: Eight articles, representing 27 missions in 9 LMIC countries during 2006-2014, met our inclusion criteria. Latin America was the most frequently visited region. Per capita costs ranged from $259 for cleft lip/cleft palate (CL/CP) missions to $2900 for a neurosurgery mission. Mission effectiveness ranged from 3 disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted per patient for orthopedic surgery missions to 8.12 DALYs averted per patient for a neurosurgery mission. CL/CP and general surgery missions were the most cost-effective, averaging $80/DALY and $87/DALY, respectively. The neurosurgical, orthopedic, and hand surgery missions averaged the highest costs/DALY averted, with the cost-effectiveness being $357/DALY, $435/DALY, and $445/DALY, respectively. All analyzed missions were very cost effective.
Conclusion: To date, this is the first study to assess the cost-effectiveness of short-term surgical missions across surgical specialties. Neurosurgical missions avert the largest number of healthy life years compared to other specialties, and thus, could yield a greater long-term benefit to resource-poor communities. We recommend that further studies be carried out to assess the impact of surgical missions in low-resource settings.
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; global surgery; low and middle income countries; medical missions; neurosurgery.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Alkire B, Hughes CD, Nash K, Vincent JR, Meara JG. Potential economic benefit of cleft lip and palate repair in sub-saharan Africa. World J Surg. 2011;35:1194–201. - PubMed
-
- Bickler SW, Weiser TG, Kassebaum N, Higashi H, Chang DC, Barendregt JJ, et al. Essential Surgery, in Disease Control Priorities. 3rd ed. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Debas, HT; 2015. pp. 1–18.
-
- Chao TE, Sharma K, Mandigo M, Hagander L, Resch SC, Weiser TG, et al. Cost-effectiveness of surgery and its policy implications for global health: A systematic review and analysis. Lancet Glob Heal. 2014;2:334–5. - PubMed
-
- Chen AT, Pedtke A, Kobs JK, Edwards GS, Coughlin RR, Gosselin RA. Volunteer Orthopedic Surgical Trips in Nicaragua: A Cost-effectiveness Evaluation. World J Surg. 2012;36:2802–8. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous