Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Jan-Feb;38(1):23-26.
doi: 10.11138/gchir/2017.38.1.023.

Lymph node assessment in colorectal cancer surgery: laparoscopic versus open techniques

Observational Study

Lymph node assessment in colorectal cancer surgery: laparoscopic versus open techniques

G Balducci et al. G Chir. 2017 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of our study is to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic resection (LR) and open resection (OR) for colorectal cancer surgery evaluating lymph node assessment. It may be important to remove and examine an adequate number of lymph nodes because a more extensive nodal resection has been associated to higher survival rate and lower recurrences.

Patients and methods: 150 patients (74 females and 76 males) with colorectal cancer were enrolled and analyzed from January 2006 to March 2010 in our Unit. 100 procedures were performed with traditional laparotomy and 50 procedures laparoscopically. A strict follow-up was scheduled every 1-3-6 months after surgery and, therefore, every year.

Results: Laparoscopic techniques require a longer operating time. 2484 total lymph nodes examined with a mean of 16,56 removed per resection in all procedures. 1632 lymph nodes were removed during open procedures and 852 removed during laparoscopy. The scheduled follow-up demonstrated that local recurrence and distant metastasis presented with no significant differences between two groups and overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed over 5 year in 80% of patients.

Conclusions: According to our experience, laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and feasible, with better short-term outcomes and oncological adequacy comparable to open approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Grosso G, Biondi A, Marventano S, et al. Major postoperative complications and survival for colon cancer elderly patients. BMC Surg. 2012;2(Suppl 1):S20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Je mal A. Cancer statistic 2013. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2013;63:11–30. - PubMed
    1. Kwon S, Billingham R, Farrokhi E, Florence M, et al. Adoption of laparoscopy for elective colorectal resection: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Jun;214(6):909–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonjer J, Hop W, Nelson H, et al. Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer; a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2007;142:298–303. - PubMed
    1. Braga M, Pecorelli N, Di Carlo V. Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2011;3(3):43–48. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources