Foot segmental motion and coupling in stage II and III tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction
- PMID: 28460254
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.04.007
Foot segmental motion and coupling in stage II and III tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction
Abstract
Background: Classification systems developed in the field of posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction omit to include dynamic measurements. Since this may negatively affect the selection of the most appropriate treatment modality, studies on foot kinematics are highly recommended. Previous research characterised the foot kinematics in patients with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction. However, none of the studies analysed foot segmental motion synchrony during stance phase, nor compared the kinematic behaviour of the foot in presence of different posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction stages. Therefore, we aimed at comparing foot segmental motion and coupling in patients with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction grade 2 and 3 to those of asymptomatic subjects.
Methods: Foot segmental motion of 11 patients suffering from posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction stage 2, 4 patients with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction stage 3 and 15 asymptomatic subjects was objectively quantified with the Rizzoli foot model using an instrumented walkway and a 3D passive motion capture system. Dependent variables were the range of motion occurring at the different inter-segment angles during subphases of stance and swing phase as well as the cross-correlation coefficient between a number of segments.
Results: Significant differences in range of motion were predominantly found during the forefoot push off phase and swing phase. In general, both patient cohorts demonstrated a reduced range of motion compared to the control group. This hypomobility occurred predominantly in the rearfoot and midfoot (p<0.01). Significant differences between both posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction patient cohorts were not revealed. Cross-correlation coefficients highlighted a loss of joint coupling between rearfoot and tibia as well as between rearfoot and forefoot in both posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction groups.
Interpretation: The current evidence reveals considerable mechanical alterations in the foot which should be considered in the decision making process since it may help explaining the success and failure of certain conservative and surgical interventions.
Keywords: Coupling; Multi-segment foot kinematics; Range of motion; Tibialis posterior dysfunction.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of foot kinematics between subjects with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction and healthy controls.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Sep;36(9):635-44. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2293. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006. PMID: 17017268
-
Comparison of changes in posterior tibialis muscle length between subjects with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction and healthy controls during walking.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Nov;37(11):661-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2539. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007. PMID: 18057670
-
Three-dimensional kinematics of the forefoot, rearfoot, and leg without the function of tibialis posterior in comparison with normals during stance phase of walking.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1999 Jan;14(1):14-23. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(98)00034-5. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1999. PMID: 10619086
-
Acquired flatfoot secondary to tibialis posterior dysfunction: biomechanical aspects.J Foot Surg. 1991 Jan-Feb;30(1):2-11. J Foot Surg. 1991. PMID: 2002182 Review.
-
Characteristics and Future Direction of Tibialis Posterior Tendinopathy Research: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 16;58(12):1858. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121858. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 36557060 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Foot Kinematics Between Normal Arch and Flexible Flatfoot Using the Oxford Foot Model: A Matched Case-Control Study.Foot Ankle Orthop. 2024 Feb 25;9(1):24730114241231245. doi: 10.1177/24730114241231245. eCollection 2024 Jan. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2024. PMID: 38410138 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of in vivo hindfoot joints motion changes during stance phase between non-flatfoot and stage II adult acquired flatfoot.J Foot Ankle Res. 2022 Oct 13;15(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13047-022-00577-w. J Foot Ankle Res. 2022. PMID: 36229819 Free PMC article.
-
"I need somebody who knows about feet" a qualitative study investigating the lived experiences of conservative treatment for patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.J Foot Ankle Res. 2019 Nov 7;12:51. doi: 10.1186/s13047-019-0360-z. eCollection 2019. J Foot Ankle Res. 2019. PMID: 31719845 Free PMC article.
-
Midfoot and ankle movement coordination during heel rise is disrupted in people with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2022 Jun;96:105662. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105662. Epub 2022 May 7. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2022. PMID: 35569256 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical