Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial
- PMID: 28460892
- DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30083-2
Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial
Abstract
Background: The calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway is important in migraine pathophysiology. We assessed the efficacy and safety of erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against the CGRP receptor, in patients with chronic migraine.
Methods: This was a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study of erenumab for adults aged 18-65 years with chronic migraine, enrolled from 69 headache and clinical research centres in North America and Europe. Chronic migraine was defined as 15 or more headache days per month, of which eight or more were migraine days. Patients were randomly assigned (3:2:2) to subcutaneous placebo, erenumab 70 mg, or erenumab 140 mg, given every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Randomisation was centrally executed using an interactive voice or web response system. Patients, study investigators, and study sponsor personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the change in monthly migraine days from baseline to the last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment (weeks 9-12). Safety endpoints were adverse events, clinical laboratory values, vital signs, and anti-erenumab antibodies. The efficacy analysis set included patients who received at least one dose of investigational product and completed at least one post-baseline monthly measurement. The safety analysis set included patients who received at least one dose of investigational product. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02066415.
Findings: From April 3, 2014, to Dec 4, 2015, 667 patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=286), erenumab 70 mg (n=191), or erenumab 140 mg (n=190). Erenumab 70 mg and 140 mg reduced monthly migraine days versus placebo (both doses -6·6 days vs placebo -4·2 days; difference -2·5, 95% CI -3·5 to -1·4, p<0·0001). Adverse events were reported in 110 (39%) of 282 patients, 83 (44%) of 190 patients, and 88 (47%) of 188 patients in the placebo, 70 mg, and 140 mg groups, respectively. The most frequent adverse events were injection-site pain, upper respiratory tract infection, and nausea. Serious adverse events were reported by seven (2%), six (3%), and two (1%) patients, respectively; none were reported in more than one patient in any group or led to discontinuation. 11 patients in the 70 mg group and three in the 140 mg group had anti-erenumab binding antibodies; none had anti-erenumab neutralising antibodies. No clinically significant abnormalities in vital signs, laboratory results, or electrocardiogram findings were identified. Of 667 patients randomly assigned to treatment, 637 completed treatment. Four withdrew because of adverse events, two each in the placebo and 140 mg groups.
Interpretation: In patients with chronic migraine, erenumab 70 mg and 140 mg reduced the number of monthly migraine days with a safety profile similar to placebo, providing evidence that erenumab could be a potential therapy for migraine prevention. Further research is needed to understand long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab, and the applicability of this study to real-world settings.
Funding: Amgen.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Challenging chronic migraine: targeting the CGRP receptor.Lancet Neurol. 2017 Jun;16(6):410-411. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30126-6. Epub 2017 Apr 28. Lancet Neurol. 2017. PMID: 28460891 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Safety and efficacy of AMG 334 for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.Lancet Neurol. 2016 Apr;15(4):382-90. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00019-3. Epub 2016 Feb 12. Lancet Neurol. 2016. PMID: 26879279 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study.Lancet. 2018 Nov 24;392(10161):2280-2287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32534-0. Epub 2018 Oct 22. Lancet. 2018. PMID: 30360965 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and efficacy of ALD403, an antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of frequent episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory phase 2 trial.Lancet Neurol. 2014 Nov;13(11):1100-1107. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70209-1. Epub 2014 Oct 5. Lancet Neurol. 2014. PMID: 25297013 Clinical Trial.
-
Erenumab for episodic migraine prophylaxis.Expert Rev Neurother. 2019 Aug;19(8):751-757. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2019.1565996. Epub 2019 Jan 29. Expert Rev Neurother. 2019. PMID: 30614741 Review.
-
Erenumab: First Global Approval.Drugs. 2018 Jul;78(11):1157-1161. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0944-0. Drugs. 2018. PMID: 29968151 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Anti-CGRP mAbs on Migraineurs: Analysis of the First Year of Therapy, 1-Month Suspension Period, and Reprisal.J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 26;12(23):7329. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237329. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38068383 Free PMC article.
-
Real-World Patient Experience of CGRP-Targeting Therapy for Migraine: a Narrative Review.Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022 Oct;26(10):783-794. doi: 10.1007/s11916-022-01077-z. Epub 2022 Sep 5. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022. PMID: 36063264 Review.
-
Efficacy and Tolerability of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Patients Aged ≥ 65 Years With Daily or Nondaily Migraine.Neurol Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;15(1):e200373. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200373. Epub 2024 Oct 8. Neurol Clin Pract. 2025. PMID: 39399553
-
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Versus Botulinum Toxin for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Evidence From Indirect Treatment Comparison.Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 3;12:631204. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.631204. eCollection 2021. Front Pharmacol. 2021. PMID: 34012392 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Comprehensive Survey on the Detection, Classification, and Challenges of Neurological Disorders.Biology (Basel). 2022 Mar 18;11(3):469. doi: 10.3390/biology11030469. Biology (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35336842 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
