Comparison of turnaround time and total cost of HIV testing before and after implementation of the 2014 CDC/APHL Laboratory Testing Algorithm for diagnosis of HIV infection
- PMID: 28461133
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.04.004
Comparison of turnaround time and total cost of HIV testing before and after implementation of the 2014 CDC/APHL Laboratory Testing Algorithm for diagnosis of HIV infection
Erratum in
-
Erratum to "Comparison of turnaround time and total cost of HIV testing before and after implementation of the 2014 CDC/APHL laboratory testing algorithm for diagnosis of HIV infection" [J. Clin. Virol. 91 (2017) 69-72].J Clin Virol. 2017 Aug;93:45. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 12. J Clin Virol. 2017. PMID: 28618289 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Updated recommendations for HIV diagnostic laboratory testing published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Association of Public Health Laboratories incorporate 4th generation HIV immunoassays, which are capable of identifying HIV infection prior to seroconversion.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare turnaround time and cost between 3rd and 4th generation HIV immunoassay-based testing algorithms for initially reactive results.
Study design: The clinical microbiology laboratory database at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN was queried for 3rd generation (from November 2012 to May 2014) and 4th generation (from May 2014 to November 2015) HIV immunoassay results. All results from downstream supplemental testing were recorded. Turnaround time (defined as the time of initial sample receipt in the laboratory to the time the final supplemental test in the algorithm was resulted) and cost (based on 2016 Medicare reimbursement rates) were assessed.
Results: A total of 76,454 and 78,998 initial tests were performed during the study period using the 3rd generation and 4th generation HIV immunoassays, respectively. There were 516 (0.7%) and 581 (0.7%) total initially reactive results, respectively. Of these, 304 (58.9%) and 457 (78.7%) were positive by supplemental testing. There were 10 (0.01%) cases of acute HIV infection identified with the 4th generation algorithm. The most frequent tests performed to confirm an HIV-positive case using the 3rd generation algorithm, which were reactive initial immunoassay and positive HIV-1 Western blot, took a median time of 1.1 days to complete at a cost of $45.00. In contrast, the most frequent tests performed to confirm an HIV-positive case using the 4th generation algorithm, which included a reactive initial immunoassay and positive HIV-1/-2 antibody differentiation immunoassay for HIV-1, took a median time of 0.4 days and cost $63.25. Overall median turnaround time was 2.2 and 1.5 days, and overall median cost was $63.90 and $72.50 for 3rd and 4th generation algorithms, respectively.
Conclusions: Both 3rd and 4th generation HIV immunoassays had similar total numbers of tests performed and positivity rates during the study period. A greater proportion of reactive 4th generation immunoassays were confirmed to be positive, and the 4th generation algorithm identified several cases of acute HIV infection that would have been missed by the 3rd generation algorithm. The 4th generation algorithm had a more rapid turnaround time but higher cost for confirmed positive HIV infections and overall, compared to the 3rd generation algorithm.
Keywords: 3rd/4th generation HIV immunoassay; CDC/APHL; Cost; Diagnosis; HIV; Turnaround time.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Performance of the new HIV-1/2 diagnostic algorithm in Florida's public health testing population: a review of the first five months of utilization.J Clin Virol. 2013 Dec;58 Suppl 1:e29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2013.08.016. Epub 2013 Aug 27. J Clin Virol. 2013. PMID: 24342476
-
Comparative performance of the Geenius™ HIV-1/HIV-2 supplemental test in Florida's public health testing population.J Clin Virol. 2017 Jun;91:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 6. J Clin Virol. 2017. PMID: 28434810
-
Evaluation of an alternative HIV diagnostic algorithm using specimens from seroconversion panels and persons with established HIV infections.J Clin Virol. 2011 Dec;52 Suppl 1:S17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.09.011. Epub 2011 Oct 5. J Clin Virol. 2011. PMID: 21981983
-
Testing for acute HIV infection: implications for treatment as prevention.Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012 Mar;7(2):125-30. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e3283506613. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012. PMID: 22314506 Free PMC article. Review.
-
HIV misdiagnosis in sub-Saharan Africa: performance of diagnostic algorithms at six testing sites.J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Jul 3;20(1):21419. doi: 10.7448/IAS.20.1.21419. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017. PMID: 28691437 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Could HIV-1 RNA Testing be an Option as the Second Step in the HIV Diagnostic Algorithm?Sex Transm Dis. 2020 May;47(5S Suppl 1):S26-S31. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001137. Sex Transm Dis. 2020. PMID: 31977972 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in testing algorithms used to diagnose HIV infection, 2011-2015, United States and 6 dependent areas.J Clin Virol. 2018 Jun;103:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 27. J Clin Virol. 2018. PMID: 29605799 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of the Alere Determine™ HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo Rapid Test with algorithm-defined acute HIV-1 infection specimens.J Clin Virol. 2018 Jul;104:89-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 14. J Clin Virol. 2018. PMID: 29803089 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of an Alternative Laboratory-Based HIV Diagnostic Testing Algorithm Using HIV-1 RNA Viral Load.Sex Transm Dis. 2020 May;47(5S Suppl 1):S18-S25. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001124. Sex Transm Dis. 2020. PMID: 31895304 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical