Efficacy and safety of ridinilazole compared with vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study
- PMID: 28461207
- PMCID: PMC5483507
- DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30235-9
Efficacy and safety of ridinilazole compared with vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study
Abstract
Background: Clostridium difficile infection is the most common health-care-associated infection in the USA. We assessed the safety and efficacy of ridinilazole versus vancomycin for treatment of C difficile infection.
Methods: We did a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study. Participants with signs and symptoms of C difficile infection and a positive diagnostic test result were recruited from 33 centres in the USA and Canada and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral ridinilazole (200 mg every 12 h) or oral vancomycin (125 mg every 6 h) for 10 days. The primary endpoint was achievement of a sustained clinical response, defined as clinical cure at the end of treatment and no recurrence within 30 days, which was used to establish non-inferiority (15% margin) of ridinilazole versus vancomycin. The primary efficacy analysis was done on a modified intention-to-treat population comprising all individuals with C difficile infection confirmed by the presence of free toxin in stool who were randomly assigned to receive one or more doses of the study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02092935.
Findings: Between June 26, 2014, and August 31, 2015, 100 patients were recruited; 50 were randomly assigned to receive ridinilazole and 50 to vancomycin. 16 patients did not complete the study, and 11 discontinued treatment early. The primary efficacy analysis included 69 patients (n=36 in the ridinilazole group; n=33 in the vancomycin group). 24 of 36 (66·7%) patients in the ridinilazole group versus 14 of 33 (42·4%) of those in the vancomycin group had a sustained clinical response (treatment difference 21·1%, 90% CI 3·1-39·1, p=0·0004), establishing the non-inferiority of ridinilazole and also showing statistical superiority at the 10% level. Ridinilazole was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of vancomycin: 82% (41 of 50) of participants reported adverse events in the ridinilazole group and 80% (40 of 50) in the vancomycin group. There were no adverse events related to ridinilazole that led to discontinuation.
Interpretation: Ridinilazole is a targeted-spectrum antimicrobial that shows potential in treatment of initial C difficile infection and in providing sustained benefit through reduction in disease recurrence. Further clinical development is warranted.
Funding: Wellcome Trust and Summit Therapeutics.
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Expanding the armamentarium for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection.Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Jul;17(7):678-680. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30237-2. Epub 2017 Apr 28. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 28461208 No abstract available.
-
Ridinilazole-a novel antibiotic for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection.J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jan;10(1):118-120. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.12.117. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 29600036 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Cadazolid for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: results of two double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trials.Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Mar;19(3):265-274. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30614-5. Epub 2019 Jan 29. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019. PMID: 30709665
-
Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for infection with Clostridium difficile in Europe, Canada, and the USA: a double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;12(4):281-9. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70374-7. Epub 2012 Feb 8. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012. PMID: 22321770 Clinical Trial.
-
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy Study of Ridinilazole Versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection: Clinical Outcomes With Microbiome and Metabolome Correlates of Response.Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 14;78(6):1462-1472. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad792. Clin Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 38305378 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Ridinilazole: a novel, narrow-spectrum antimicrobial agent targeting Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile.Lett Appl Microbiol. 2022 Sep;75(3):526-536. doi: 10.1111/lam.13664. Epub 2022 Feb 11. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35119124 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ridinilazole: a novel therapy for Clostridium difficile infection.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Aug;48(2):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 May 30. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016. PMID: 27283730 Review.
Cited by
-
Microbiome and Metabolome Insights into the Role of the Gastrointestinal-Brain Axis in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's Disease: Unveiling Potential Therapeutic Targets.Metabolites. 2022 Dec 5;12(12):1222. doi: 10.3390/metabo12121222. Metabolites. 2022. PMID: 36557259 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: An official clinical practice guideline of the Spanish Society of Chemotherapy (SEQ), Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) and the working group of Postoperative Infection of the Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Reanimation (SEDAR).Rev Esp Quimioter. 2020 Apr;33(2):151-175. doi: 10.37201/req/2065.2020. Epub 2020 Feb 20. Rev Esp Quimioter. 2020. PMID: 32080996 Free PMC article.
-
Ridinilazole: a novel antimicrobial for Clostridium difficile infection.Ann Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar-Apr;32(2):134-140. doi: 10.20524/aog.2018.0336. Epub 2018 Dec 13. Ann Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 30837785 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Encapsulation protocol for fecal microbiota transplantation.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Jun 26;14:1424376. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1424376. eCollection 2024. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 38988813 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection.Ann Med. 2020 Feb-Mar;52(1-2):12-20. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2019.1701703. Epub 2019 Dec 13. Ann Med. 2020. PMID: 31801387 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Davies KA, Longshaw CM, Davis GL. Underdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile across Europe: the European, multicentre, prospective, biannual, point-prevalence study of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalised patients with diarrhoea (EUCLID) Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:1208–1219. - PubMed
-
- Bauer MP, Notermans DW, van Benthem BH, for the ECDIS Study Group Clostridium difficile infection in Europe: a hospital-based survey. Lancet. 2011;377:63–73. - PubMed
-
- Magee G, Strauss ME, Thomas SM, Brown H, Baumer D, Broderick KC. Impact of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea on acute care length of stay, hospital costs, and readmission: a multicenter retrospective study of inpatients, 2009–2011. Am J Infect Control. 2015;43:1148–1153. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical