Evaluating physical function and activity in the elderly patient using wearable motion sensors
- PMID: 28461937
- PMCID: PMC5367538
- DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.160022
Evaluating physical function and activity in the elderly patient using wearable motion sensors
Abstract
Wearable sensors, in particular inertial measurement units (IMUs) allow the objective, valid, discriminative and responsive assessment of physical function during functional tests such as gait, stair climbing or sit-to-stand.Applied to various body segments, precise capture of time-to-task achievement, spatiotemporal gait and kinematic parameters of demanding tests or specific to an affected limb are the most used measures.In activity monitoring (AM), accelerometry has mainly been used to derive energy expenditure or general health related parameters such as total step counts.In orthopaedics and the elderly, counting specific events such as stairs or high intensity activities were clinimetrically most powerful; as were qualitative parameters at the 'micro-level' of activity such as step frequency or sit-stand duration.Low cost and ease of use allow routine clinical application but with many options for sensors, algorithms, test and parameter definitions, choice and comparability remain difficult, calling for consensus or standardisation. Cite this article: Grimm B, Bolink S. Evaluating physical function and activity in the elderly patient using wearable motion sensors. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:112-120. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.160022.
Keywords: accelerometry; activity monitoring; gait analysis; outcome assessment; physical function; wearable sensors.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
A new instrumented method for the evaluation of gait initiation and step climbing based on inertial sensors: a pilot application in Parkinson's disease.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 May 5;12:45. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0038-0. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 25940457 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing Gait in Parkinson's Disease Using Wearable Motion Sensors: A Systematic Review.Diseases. 2019 Feb 5;7(1):18. doi: 10.3390/diseases7010018. Diseases. 2019. PMID: 30764502 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Inertial sensor motion analysis of gait, sit-stand transfers and step-up transfers: differentiating knee patients from healthy controls.Physiol Meas. 2012 Nov;33(11):1947-58. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/11/1947. Epub 2012 Oct 31. Physiol Meas. 2012. PMID: 23110821
-
Validation of an accelerometer for measurement of activity in frail older people.Gait Posture. 2018 Oct;66:114-117. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.08.024. Epub 2018 Aug 23. Gait Posture. 2018. PMID: 30172217
-
Wearable Sensors to Monitor, Enable Feedback, and Measure Outcomes of Activity and Practice.Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018 Oct 6;18(12):87. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0896-5. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30293160 Review.
Cited by
-
Analysis of Machine Learning-Based Assessment for Elbow Spasticity Using Inertial Sensors.Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 14;20(6):1622. doi: 10.3390/s20061622. Sensors (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32183281 Free PMC article.
-
Towards a comprehensive digital wearable tracking system of the patient recovery journey after extremity trauma: a narrative review.EFORT Open Rev. 2025 Jul 1;10(7):445-453. doi: 10.1530/EOR-2024-0154. EFORT Open Rev. 2025. PMID: 40591659 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Validity of accelerometry in step detection and gait speed measurement in orthogeriatric patients.PLoS One. 2019 Aug 30;14(8):e0221732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221732. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31469864 Free PMC article.
-
Use of accelerometer-based activity monitoring in orthopaedics: benefits, impact and practical considerations.EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Jan 28;4(12):678-685. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180041. eCollection 2019 Dec. EFORT Open Rev. 2020. PMID: 32010456 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Exploring the clinical context of adopting an instrumented insole: a qualitative study of clinicians' preferences in England.BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 20;9(4):e023656. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023656. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31005908 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Greene BR, Doheny EP, O’Halloran A, Anne Kenny R. Frailty status can be accurately assessed using inertial sensors and the TUG test. Age Ageing 2014;43:406-11. PMID: 24212918. - PubMed
-
- Dobson F, Hinman RS, Hall M, Terwee CB, Roos EM, Bennell KL. Measurement properties of performance-based measures to assess physical function in hip and knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012;20:1548-62. PMID: 22944525. - PubMed
-
- Terwee CB, Bouwmeester W, van Elsland SL, de Vet HC, Dekker J. Instruments to assess physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011;19:620-33. PMID: 21251989. - PubMed
-
- Dobson F, Hinman RS, Roos EM, Abbott JH, Stratford P, Davis AM, et al. OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:1042-52. PMID: 23680877. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources