Short dental implants in the posterior maxilla: a review of the literature
- PMID: 28462189
- PMCID: PMC5410430
- DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.2.70
Short dental implants in the posterior maxilla: a review of the literature
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to perform a literature review of short implants in the posterior maxilla and to assess the influence of different factors on implant success rate. A comprehensive search was conducted to retrieve articles published from 2004 to 2015 using short dental implants with lengths less than 10 mm in the posterior maxilla with at least one year of follow-up. Twenty-four of 253 papers were selected, reviewed, and produced the following results. (1) The initial survival rate of short implants in the posterior maxilla was not related to implant width, surface, or design; however, the cumulative success rate of rough-surface short implants was higher than that of machined-surface implants especially in performance of edentulous dental implants of length <7 mm. (2) While bone augmentation can be used for rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla, short dental implants may be an alternative approach with fewer biological complications. (3) The increased crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio and occlusal table (OT) values in short dental implants with favorable occlusal loading do not seem to cause peri-implant bone loss. Higher C/I ratio does not produce any negative influence on implant success. (4) Some approaches that decrease the stress in posterior short implants use an implant designed to increase bone-implant contact surface area, providing the patient with a mutually protected or canine guidance occlusion and splinting implants together with no cantilever load. The survival rate of short implants in the posterior edentulous maxilla is high, and applying short implants under strict clinical protocols seems to be a safe and predictable technique.
Keywords: Dental implants; Maxilla.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Similar articles
-
Immediate loading in partially and completely edentulous jaws: a review of the literature with clinical guidelines.Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):153-87. doi: 10.1111/prd.12040. Periodontol 2000. 2014. PMID: 25123767 Review.
-
Survival of short implants is improved with greater implant length, placement in the mandible compared with the maxilla, and in nonsmokers.J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012 Sep;12(3 Suppl):189-91. doi: 10.1016/S1532-3382(12)70035-0. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012. PMID: 23253845
-
Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla including immediate fixed provisional restoration without the use of bone grafting: a review of 1-year outcome data from a long-term prospective clinical trial.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):518-26. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009. PMID: 19587876 Clinical Trial.
-
Descriptive analysis of implant and prosthodontic survival rates with fixed implant-supported rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla.J Periodontol. 2009 Aug;80(8):1220-30. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090109. J Periodontol. 2009. PMID: 19656021 Review.
-
Implant loading protocols for partially edentulous maxillary posterior sites.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:147-57. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009. PMID: 19885442
Cited by
-
Clinical Outcome of Immediate Loading UV-Photofunctionalized Implants in Patients with Completely Edentulous Mandible, Placed with Guided Surgery.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Mar;22(Suppl 1):64-75. doi: 10.1007/s12663-022-01798-z. Epub 2022 Dec 15. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023. PMID: 37041958 Free PMC article.
-
Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Jul 16;7(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00348-5. Int J Implant Dent. 2021. PMID: 34268630 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Short Implants and Indirect Sinus Lift Versus Direct Sinus Lift With Standard-Length Implants: A Case Report.Cureus. 2024 Jul 23;16(7):e65197. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65197. eCollection 2024 Jul. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39176339 Free PMC article.
-
Short Implants versus Longer Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Post-Loading Follow-Up Duration of 5 Years.Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 5;15(13):4722. doi: 10.3390/ma15134722. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35806845 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Marginal Bone Changes Around Tissue-Level Implants After Prosthesis Delivery: A Multicenter Prospective Study.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Jun;27(3):e70071. doi: 10.1111/cid.70071. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 40500982 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sato T, Abe T, Nakamoto N, Tomaru Y, Koshikiya N, Nojima J, et al. Nicotine induces cell proliferation in association with cyclin D1 up-regulation and inhibits cell differentiation in association with p53 regulation in a murine pre-osteoblastic cell line. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;377:126–130. - PubMed
-
- Mertens C, Meyer-Bäumer A, Kappel H, Hoffmann J, Steveling HG. Use of 8-mm and 9-mm implants in atrophic alveolar ridges: 10-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:1501–1508. - PubMed
-
- Sennerby L, Roos J. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11:408–420. - PubMed
-
- Kim YK, Hwang JY, Yun PY. Relationship between prognosis of dental implants and maxillary sinusitis associated with the sinus elevation procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:178–183. - PubMed
-
- Kim BJ, Lee JH. The retrospective study of survival rate of implants with maxillary sinus floor elevation. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;36:108–118.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources