Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 31:2:2333393615576714.
doi: 10.1177/2333393615576714. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.

Communication in Hong Kong Accident and Emergency Departments: The Clinicians' Perspectives

Affiliations

Communication in Hong Kong Accident and Emergency Departments: The Clinicians' Perspectives

Eloise Chandler et al. Glob Qual Nurs Res. .

Abstract

In this article, we report findings from the first qualitatively driven study of patient-clinician communication in Hong Kong Accident and Emergency Departments (AEDs). In light of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority's policy emphasis on patient-centered care and communication in the public hospitals it oversees, we analyze clinicians' perceptions of the role and relevance of patient-centered communication strategies in emergency care. Although aware of the importance of effective communication in emergency care, participants discussed how this was frequently jeopardized by chronic understaffing, patient loads, and time pressures. This was raised in relation to the absence of spoken interdisciplinary handovers, the tendency to downgrade interpersonal communication with patients, and the decline in staff attendance at communication training courses. Participants' frequent descriptions of patient-centered communication as dispensable from, and time-burdensome in, AEDs highlight a discrepancy between the stated Hong Kong Hospital Authority policy of patient-centered care and the reality of contemporary Hong Kong emergency practice.

Keywords: communication, health care professionals; emergency care; empathy; health care, interprofessional; interviews, semi-structured; relationships, health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bennett K., Smith D. H., Irwin H. (1999). Preferences for participation in medical decisions in China. Health Communication, 11, 261–284. doi:10.1207/S1532702 7HC110308
    1. Bowen G. A. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, Article 2. Retrieved from ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_3/pdf/bowen.pdf
    1. Buckley B. A., McCarthy D. M., Forth V. E., Tanabe P., Schmidt M. J., Adams J. G., Engel K. G. (2013). Patient input into the development and enhancement of ED discharge instructions: A focus group study. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 39, 553–561. doi:10.1016/j.jen.2011.12.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cameron K. A., Engel K. G., McCarthy D. M., Buckley B. A., Mercer Kollar L. M., Donlan S. M., . . . Adams J. G. (2010). Examining emergency department communication through a staff-based participatory research method: Identifying barriers and solutions to meaningful change. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 56, 614–622. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.03.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chiu H. S., Chung C. H. (2000). Risk management in emergency department. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7, 96–103.

LinkOut - more resources