Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 2;17(1):315.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2261-9.

Was federal parity associated with changes in Out-of-network mental health care use and spending?

Susan H Busch  1 , Emma E Mcginty  2   3 , Elizabeth A Stuart  2   3   4 , Haiden A Huskamp  5 , Teresa B Gibson  6 , Howard H Goldman  7 , Colleen L Barry  2   3
Affiliations

Was federal parity associated with changes in Out-of-network mental health care use and spending?

Susan H Busch et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The goal of the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act is to eliminate differences in insurance coverage between behavioral health and general medical care. The law requires out-of-network mental health benefits be equivalent to out-of-network medical/surgical benefits. Insurers were concerned this provision would lead to unsustainable increases in out-of-network related expenditures. We examined whether federal parity implementation was associated with significant increases in out-of-network mental health care use and spending.

Methods: We conducted an interrupted time series analysis using health insurance claims from self-insured employers (2007-2012). We examined changes in the probability of using out-of-network mental health services and, conditional on out-of-network mental health service use, changes in the number of outpatient out-of-network mental health visits and total out-of-network mental health spending associated with the implementation of federal parity in 2010.

Results: From 2007 to 2012, the proportion of individuals receiving any out-of-network mental health services each month declined dramatically from 18 to 12%, with a one-time drop of 3 percentage points at parity implementation (p < .01). Among out-of-network mental health service users, there was an increase in the number of visits per month (.12 visits; p < .01) and total spending per month ($49; p < .01) at parity implementation. Although there was a one-time increase in spending at parity implementation, this increase was accompanied by an attenuation of a trend toward increased spending growth, such that spending was back to original predictions by the end of our study period.

Conclusions: Despite concerns expressed by the health insurance industry when federal parity was enacted, out-of-network mental health spending did not substantially increase after parity implementation. In addition, use of out-of-network mental health services appears to have contracted rather than expanded, suggesting insurers may have implemented other policies to curb out-of-network use, such as increasing access to in-network providers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Share of mental health service users with any out-of-network mental health service use, 2007-2012. Notes: Predicted values (blue line) are derived using estimated coefficients to predict use and spending over the time period studied. Forecasted values in the absence of parity (red line) indicate model predictions of what would have occurred in the absence of federal parity implementation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Average total OON mental health spending among out-of-network mental health service users, 2007-2012. Notes: Predicted values (blue line) are derived using estimated coefficients to predict use and spending over the time period studied. Forecasted values in the absence of parity (red line) indicate model predictions of what would have occurred in the absence of federal parity implementation
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Interim final rules under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici mental health parity and addiction equity Act of 2008. Interim final rules with request for comments. Fed Regist. 2010;75(21):5409. - PubMed
    1. Barry CL, Huskamp HA, Goldman HH. A political history of federal mental health and addiction insurance parity. Milbank Q. 2010;88(3):404–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00605.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barry CL, Venkatesh M, Busch SH. Assessing new patient access to mental health providers in HMO networks. Psychiatr Serv. 2008;59(12):1413–8. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.12.1413. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kyanko KA, Busch SH. The out-of-network benefit: problems and policy solutions. Inquiry. 2013;49:352–61. - PubMed
    1. America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) The value of provider networks and the role of out-of-network charges in rising health care costs: a survey of charges billed by out-of-network physicians. Washington, D.C: AHIP; 2009.