Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 2;15(1):91.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0850-4.

Application of real-time global media monitoring and 'derived questions' for enhancing communication by regulatory bodies: the case of human papillomavirus vaccines

Affiliations

Application of real-time global media monitoring and 'derived questions' for enhancing communication by regulatory bodies: the case of human papillomavirus vaccines

Priya Bahri et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: The benefit-risk balance of vaccines is regularly debated by the public, but the utility of media monitoring for regulatory bodies is unclear. A media monitoring study was conducted at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) concerning human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines during a European Union (EU) referral procedure assessing the potential causality of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) reported to the authorities as suspected adverse reactions.

Methods: To evaluate the utility of media monitoring in real life, prospective real-time monitoring of worldwide online news was conducted from September to December 2015 with inductive content analysis, generating 'derived questions'. The evaluation was performed through the validation of the predictive capacity of these questions against journalists' queries, review of the EMA's public statement and feedback from EU regulators.

Results: A total of 4230 news items were identified, containing personal stories, scientific and policy/process-related topics. Explicit and implicit concerns were identified, including those raised due to lack of knowledge or anticipated once more information would be published. Fifty derived questions were generated and categorised into 12 themes. The evaluation demonstrated that providing the media monitoring findings to assessors and communicators resulted in (1) confirming that public concerns regarding CRPS and POTS would be covered by the assessment; (2) meeting specific information needs proactively in the public statement; (3) predicting all queries from journalists; and (4) altering the tone of the public statement with respectful acknowledgement of the health status of patients with CRSP or POTS.

Conclusions: The study demonstrated the potential utility of media monitoring for regulatory bodies to support communication proactivity and preparedness, intended to support trusted safe and effective vaccine use. Derived questions seem to be a familiar and effective format for presenting media monitoring results in the scientific-regulatory environment. It is suggested that media monitoring could form part of regular surveillance for medicines of high public interest. Future work is recommended to develop efficient monitoring strategies for that purpose.

Keywords: Communication; EMA; HPV vaccines; Media monitoring; Medicines; Regulatory bodies; Vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Time chart depicting volume of worldwide media coverage from 7 September to 23 December 2015 by day and identifying peaks (generated by the Vuelio® system)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Leach M, Fairhead J. Vaccine anxieties: global science, child health and society. London: Taylor & Francis Earthscan; 2007.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) SAGE working group dealing with vaccine hesitancy. Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy: a systematic review. Geneva: WHO; 2014. http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2014/october/3_SAGE_WG_Str....
    1. European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Heads of Medicines Agencies. Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices — product- or population-specific considerations I: vaccines for prophylaxis against infectious diseases. London: EMA; 2013. http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/regulation/document_li....
    1. Bahri P. Public pharmacovigilance communication: a process calling for evidence-based, objective-driven strategies. Drug Saf. 2010;33:1065–1079. doi: 10.2165/11539040-000000000-00000. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larson H, Brocard Paterson P, Erondu N. The globalization of risk and risk perception: why we need a new model of risk communication for vaccines. Drug Saf. 2012;35:1053–9. - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources