Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 4;2(9):e92033.
doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.92033.

CTLA4-Ig in combination with FTY720 promotes allograft survival in sensitized recipients

Affiliations

CTLA4-Ig in combination with FTY720 promotes allograft survival in sensitized recipients

Stella H Khiew et al. JCI Insight. .

Abstract

Despite recent evidence of improved graft outcomes and safety, the high incidence of early acute cellular rejection with belatacept, a high-affinity CTLA4-Ig, has limited its use in clinical transplantation. Here we define how the incomplete control of endogenous donor-reactive memory T cells results in belatacept-resistant rejection in an experimental model of BALB/c.2W-OVA donor heart transplantation into C57BL/6 recipients presensitized to donor splenocytes. These sensitized mice harbored modestly elevated numbers of endogenous donor-specific memory T cells and alloantibodies compared with naive recipients. Continuous CTLA4-Ig treatment was unexpectedly efficacious at inhibiting endogenous graft-reactive T cell expansion but was unable to inhibit late CD4+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration into the allografts, and rejection was observed in 50% of recipients by day 35 after transplantation. When CTLA4-Ig was combined with the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor-1 (S1PR1) functional antagonist FTY720, alloantibody production was inhibited and donor-specific IFN-γ-producing T cells were reduced to levels approaching nonsensitized tolerant recipients. Late T cell recruitment into the graft was also restrained, and graft survival improved with this combination therapy. These observations suggest that a rational strategy consisting of inhibiting memory T cell expansion and trafficking into the allograft with CTLA4-Ig and FTY720 can promote allograft survival in allosensitized recipients.

Keywords: Immunology; Transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Generation of allosensitized recipients.
(A) C57BL/6 mice were sensitized with 2W-OVA.B/c splenocytes (DST; s.c.) at ~14 months (n = 10–12/group). (B) Donor-specific IgG as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). (C) Total number/mouse of naive (CD44CD62L+), central memory (TCM; CD44+CD62L+), and effector memory (TEM; CD44+CD62L) of 2W:I-Ab CD4+ and OVA:Kb CD8+ T cells in B/c-sensitized (n = 6) and naive mice (n = 8). Combined spleens and axial, brachial, and inguinal lymph nodes were stained, gated on DumpCD90+ T cells, separated into CD4+ and CD8+ gates, and examined for 2W:I-Ab or OVA:Kb multimer binding and CD44/CD62L expression. (C and D) Gating strategy is provided in Supplemental Figure 1A and symbols represent individual mice, pooled from 2 to 3 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, and statistical significance was determined by (B) unpaired t test or (C and D) ANOVA and Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.005.
Figure 2
Figure 2. CLTA4-Ig delays graft rejection in allosensitized recipients.
(A) C57BL/6 mice sensitized with 2W-OVA.B/c or B/c splenocytes (DST; s.c.) for more than 14 months were transplanted with 2W-OVA.B/c or B/c hearts, respectively, and treated with 500 μg CTLA4-Ig/mouse on day –2, 0, and 2 (i.v.), and then at 250 μg/mouse (i.p.) twice per week until the end of the experiment. (B) Survival of the heart allografts pooled from more than 2 experiments/group. From recipients sensitized for 14 or more months, (C) donor-specific IgG, and (D) frequency of in vitro–stimulated IFN-γ–producing CD4+ or CD8+ T effector memory (TEM) or central memory (TCM) cells on day 30 after transplantation (n = 5–12/group). Donor-specific IFN-γ production was evaluated by incubating responder splenocytes with previously LPS-stimulated and T cell–deficient B/6 or T cell–depleted B/6xB/c.F1 cells in vitro. The percentage of donor-specific IFN-γ+ T cells was determined after subtracting syngeneic cell stimulation from allogeneic cell stimulation (n = 2–5/group). Symbols represent individual mice, pooled from 1 to 3 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, and statistical significance was determined by (B) log-rank test or (C and D) ANOVA and Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.001. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; N, naive; S, sensitized; HTx, heart transplant.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Control of endogenous T cell expansion in sensitized recipients treated with CTLA4-Ig.
(A and B) Total numbers, (C and D) percentage of naive, central (TCM), or effector memory (TEM), and (E and F) total number of TEM of 2W:I-Ab or OVA:Kb T cells per sensitized mouse at day 30 after heart transplant. Data were pooled from 2 to 4 independent experiments (n = 6–8/group; same mice as analyzed for AF), with the minimum number of cells set at 100. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and statistical analyses by ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis or Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparison tests. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.005; ****P < 0.001. N, nonsensitized; S, sensitized; HTx, heart transplant.
Figure 4
Figure 4. T cell infiltration into allografts of sensitized recipients treated with CTLA4-Ig.
(A) Histology of allografts from sensitized + CTLA4-Ig (n = 5) and naive + CTLA4-Ig (n = 6) at day 30 after transplantation. Original magnification, ×20. Scale bars: 200 μm. (B) Histological scores and (C) quantification of the total numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells recovered from heart allografts (n = 3–4/group). Data were pooled from 2 independent experiments and presented as mean ± SEM, and statistical analyses were by (B) unpaired t test or (C) ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.005. N, nonsensitized; S, sensitized; HTx, heart transplant.
Figure 5
Figure 5. CTLA4-Ig plus FTY720 combination therapy prevents rejection in sensitized recipients.
(A) Donor-specific antibody (DSA)-IgG and (B) IFN-γ T cell responses were assessed in ~4-month post-sensitization recipients (S) prior to transplantation, or on day 30 after transplantation (HTx) and treatment with CTLA4-Ig and/or FTY720. Nonsensitized tolerant recipients (N-Tol) received anti-CD154 (day 0, 7, and 14) plus B/c spleen cells (day 0) to induce tolerance to B/c heart grafts, and were analyzed on day 60 after transplantation. Data were pooled from 2 to 3 independent experiments (n = 6–8/group), with the minimum number of IFN-γ+ T cells set at 100. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, and statistical analyses were by ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Efficacy of CTLA4-Ig plus FTY720 combination therapy in preventing T cell infiltration and rejection in sensitized mice.
(A) FTY720 in combination with CTLA4-Ig reduced the total number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and (B) TCR75 T cells infiltrating the B/c heart grafts transplanted into ~4-month-sensitized recipients on day 30 after transplantation. (C) Histology of the heart grafts on day 30 after transplant. Original magnification, ×20. Scale bars: 200 μm. (D) Histological scores are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5/group). (E) Cumulative allograft survival of recipients sensitized for 4 or more months ± TCR75. Data are pooled from 2 to 4 independent experiments, and statistical analyses were by (A) ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests, (B and D) unpaired t test, or (E) log-rank test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.005. HTx, heart transplant; S, sensitized; N-Tol, nonsensitized tolerant mice as described in Figure 5.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vincenti F, et al. Belatacept and long-term outcomes in kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(4):333–343. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vincenti F, et al. Five-year safety and efficacy of belatacept in renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(9):1587–1596. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009111109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Espinosa J, et al. CD57(+) CD4 T cells underlie belatacept-resistant allograft rejection. Am J Transplant. 2016;16(4):1102–1112. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13613. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Veiga-Fernandes H, Walter U, Bourgeois C, McLean A, Rocha B. Response of naïve and memory CD8+ T cells to antigen stimulation in vivo. Nat Immunol. 2000;1(1):47–53. doi: 10.1038/76907. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kumar R, et al. Increased sensitivity of antigen-experienced T cells through the enrichment of oligomeric T cell receptor complexes. Immunity. 2011;35(3):375–387. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.08.010. - DOI - PubMed