Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 May 3;7(1):1456.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01681-9.

Serum anion gap at admission as a predictor of mortality in the pediatric intensive care unit

Affiliations
Observational Study

Serum anion gap at admission as a predictor of mortality in the pediatric intensive care unit

Min Jung Kim et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

An accurate method to predict the mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) patients has been required, especially in children. The aim of this study is to evaluate the value of serum anion gap (AG) for predicting mortality in pediatric ICU (PICU). We reviewed a data of 461 pediatric patients were collected on PICU admission. Corrected anion gap (cAG), the AG compensated for abnormal albumin levels, was significantly lower in survivors compared with nonsurvivors (p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified the following variables as independent predictors of mortality; cAG (OR 1.110, 95% CI 1.06-1.17; p < 0.001), PIM3 [OR 7.583, 95% CI 1.81-31.78; p = 0.006], and PRISM III [OR 1.076, 95% CI 1.02-1.14; p = 0.008]. Comparing AUCs for mortality prediction, there were no statistically significant differences between cAG and other mortality prediction models; cAG 0.728, PIM2 0.779, PIM3 0.822, and PRISM III 0.808. The corporation of cAG to pre-existing mortality prediction models was significantly more accurate at predicting mortality than using any of these models alone. We concluded that cAG at ICU admission may be used to predict mortality in children, regardless of underlying etiology. And the incorporation of cAG to pre-existing mortality prediction models might improve predictability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for mortality between corrected anion gap and pre-existing mortality prediction models in PICU. There were no differences between corrected anion gap and other prediction models for mortality. PIM3 showed the best power to predict in-hospital mortality (area under the ROC curve, 0.822 [95% CI, 0.767–0.877]).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival curves for the patients according to cutoff value of corrected anion gap. The cutoff value of initial corrected anion gap was defined by 18.0 mEq/L (p < 0.001 by log-rank test).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Straney L, et al. Paediatric index of mortality 3: an updated model for predicting mortality in pediatric intensive care*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14:673–681. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31829760cf. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kraut JA, Madias NE. Serum anion gap: its uses and limitations in clinical medicine. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2:162–174. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03020906. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salem MM, SK M. Gaps in the anion gap. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1625–1629. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1992.00400200063011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. BE B. Clinical significance of the elevated anion gap. Am J Med. 1985;79:289–296. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90306-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Imran MN, et al. Early predictors of mortality in pneumococcal bacteraemia. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2005;34:426–431. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms