Clinical and quality of life outcomes following anatomical lung resection for lung cancer in high-risk patients
- PMID: 28469717
- PMCID: PMC5399695
- DOI: 10.4103/atm.ATM_385_16
Clinical and quality of life outcomes following anatomical lung resection for lung cancer in high-risk patients
Abstract
Background: Surgery remains the gold standard for patients with resectable nonsmall cell lung cancer. Current guidance identifies patients with poor pulmonary reserve to fall within a high-risk cohort. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and quality of life outcomes of anatomical lung resection in patients deemed high risk based on pulmonary function measurements.
Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing anatomical lung resection for nonsmall cell lung cancer between January 2013 and January 2015 was performed. All patients with limited pulmonary reserve defined as predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s or transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide of <40% were included in the study. Postoperative complications, admission to the Intensive Care Unit, length of stay, and 30-day in-hospital mortality were recorded. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire lung cancer 13 questionnaire was used to assess quality of life outcomes.
Results: Fifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. There was no in-hospital mortality, and 30-day mortality was 1.8%. No complications were seen in 64% (n = 34), minor complications occurred in 26% (n = 14), while 9% had a major complication (n = 5). Quality of life outcomes were above the reference results for patients with early stage lung cancer.
Conclusion: Anatomical lung resection can be performed safely in selected high-risk patients based on pulmonary function without significant increase in morbidity or mortality and with acceptable quality of life outcomes. Given that complications following lung resection are multifactorial, fitness for surgery should be thoroughly assessed in all patients with resectable disease within a multidisciplinary setting. High operative risk by pulmonary function tests alone should not preclude surgical resection.
Keywords: Anatomical lung resection; high-risk patients; nonsmall cell lung cancer.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Lung resection in patients with compromised pulmonary function.Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Aug;62(2):348-51. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996. PMID: 8694589
-
Respiratory function changes after chemotherapy: an additional risk for postoperative respiratory complications?Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jan;77(1):260-5; discussion 265. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01487-5. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 14726074
-
Chest wall resection for non-small cell lung cancer: A case-matched study of postoperative pulmonary function and quality of life.Lung Cancer. 2017 Apr;106:37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Jan 29. Lung Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28285692
-
Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on extubation times, length of stay and mortality rates in adult cardiac surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 May;16(5):1220-1239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003488. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018. PMID: 29762314
-
[Risk assessment of patients before lung surgery].Chirurg. 1999 Jun;70(6):664-73. doi: 10.1007/s001040050703. Chirurg. 1999. PMID: 10427453 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Postoperative Management of Hyperinflated Native Lung in Single-Lung Transplant Recipients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Review Article.Pulm Ther. 2021 Jun;7(1):37-46. doi: 10.1007/s41030-020-00141-6. Epub 2020 Dec 2. Pulm Ther. 2021. PMID: 33263926 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Lung Cancer: A Review for Clinicians.Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2022 Jul 29;9(3):454-476. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2022.0296. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2022. PMID: 35790131 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Lung Cancer Audit Annual Report 2015 (For the Audit Period 2014) London: Royal College of Physicians; 2015. Royal College of Physicians.
-
- Lim E, Baldwin D, Beckles M, Duffy J, Entwisle J, Faivre-Finn C, et al. Guidelines on the radical management of patients with lung cancer. Thora×. 2010;65(Suppl 3):iii1–27. - PubMed
-
- Markos J, Mullan BP, Hillman DR, Musk AW, Antico VF, Lovegrove FT, et al. Preoperative assessment as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after lung resection. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;139:902–10. - PubMed
-
- Bolliger CT, Jordan P, Solèr M, Stulz P, Grädel E, Skarvan K, et al. Exercise capacity as a predictor of postoperative complications in lung resection candidates. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151:1472–80. - PubMed
-
- Pierce RJ, Copland JM, Sharpe K, Barter CE. Preoperative risk evaluation for lung cancer resection: Predicted postoperative product as a predictor of surgical mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150:947–55. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous