Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 1;9(4):e516-e519.
doi: 10.4317/jced.53496. eCollection 2017 Apr.

Influence of enhancement filters in apical bone loss measurement: A cone-beam computed tomography study

Affiliations

Influence of enhancement filters in apical bone loss measurement: A cone-beam computed tomography study

Emerson-Tavares de Sousa et al. J Clin Exp Dent. .

Abstract

Background: The use of cone-beam computed tomography images (CBCT) providing a better assessment of bone injuries, although the sensibility of lesions measurement might be improved by the use of enhancement filters. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the influence of enhancement filters in apical bone loss measurement.

Material and methods: Eighteen CBCT cases randomly selected of apical bone loss were evaluated. The analyses were carried out following the evaluation in axial, coronal and sagittal protocols, using enhancement filters as Hard, Normal, and Very Sharp. The variables were statistically analyzed by Friedman and Wilcoxon test, Spearman's rho, and intraclass correlation coefficient.

Results: The differences between filters in axial and sagittal protocols were significant (p<0.05); however, this was not observed in the coronal slice. The use of Hard filter demonstrates better results than Very Sharp and Normal filter, improving significantly the bone loss measurement. A strong, significant and positive correlation was noted for all filters (with p< 0.001), such as a strong agreement between the variables, when the Normal filter was used as a reference.

Conclusions: The use of enhancement filters increases the sensitivity of alveolar bone loss measurement, with relative advantage for Hard filter. Key words:Cone-Beam computed tomography. endodontics. periapical periodontitis. image enhancement. alveolar bone loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement:The authors declare not having any ethical or personal conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Okada K, Rysavy S, Flores A, Linguraru MG. Noninvasive differential diagnosis of dental periapical lesions in cone-beam CT scans. Med Phys. 2015;42:1653–65. - PubMed
    1. Yoshioka T, Kikuchi I, Adorno CG, Suda H. Periapical bone defects of root filled teeth with persistent lesions evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2011;44:245–52. - PubMed
    1. Scarfe WC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements, and steps to interpretation. Aust Dent J. 2012;57:46–60. - PubMed
    1. Tyndall DA, Kohltfarber H. Application of cone beam volumetric tomography in Endodontics. Aust Dent J. 2012;57:72–81. - PubMed
    1. Durack C, Patel S, Davies J, Wilson R, Mannocci F. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption. Int Endod J. 2011;44:136–47. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources