Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 28;4(2):ofx012.
doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx012. eCollection 2017 Spring.

Risk of Acute Liver Injury With Antiretroviral Therapy by Viral Hepatitis Status

Affiliations

Risk of Acute Liver Injury With Antiretroviral Therapy by Viral Hepatitis Status

Charitha Gowda et al. Open Forum Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The risk of hepatotoxicity with antiretroviral therapy (ART) remains unknown. We determined the comparative risk of acute liver injury (ALI) for antiretroviral drugs, classes, and regimens, by viral hepatitis status.

Methods: We followed a cohort of 10 083 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (n = 2099) from 2004 to 2010 and the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (n = 7984) from 2004 to 2012. Within the first year of ART, we determined occurrence of (1) liver aminotransferases >200 U/L and (2) severe ALI (coagulopathy with hyperbilirubinemia). We used Cox regression to determine hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of endpoints among initiators of nucleos(t)ide analogue combinations, antiretroviral classes, and ART regimens, all stratified by viral hepatitis status.

Results: Liver aminotransferases >200 U/L developed in 206 (2%) persons and occurred more frequently among HIV/viral hepatitis-coinfected than HIV-monoinfected persons (116.1 vs 20.7 events/1000 person-years; P < .001). No evidence of differential risk was found between initiators of abacavir/lamivudine versus tenofovir/emtricitabine among coinfected (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, .29-1.57) or HIV-monoinfected (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, .47-2.97) groups. Coinfected patients had a higher risk of aminotransferases >200 U/L after initiation with a protease inhibitor than nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.36-2.96). Severe ALI (30 events; 0.3%) occurred more frequently in coinfected persons (15.9 vs 3.1 events/1000 person-years; P < .001) but was too uncommon to evaluate in adjusted analyses.

Conclusions: Within the year after ART initiation, aminotransferase elevations were infrequently observed and rarely led to severe ALI. Protease inhibitor use was associated with a higher risk of aminotransferase elevations among viral hepatitis-coinfected patients.

Keywords: HIV; antiretroviral; drug-induced liver injury; hepatotoxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Selection of patients into the study from Kaiser Permanente Northern California and the Veterans Aging Cohort Study. aIndex Date is the earliest qualifying date the antiretroviral therapy was dispensed in an outpatient setting on or after January 1, 2004. bSevere acute liver injury is defined as total bilirubin >2 times the upper limit of normal and an international normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.5 in an inpatient or outpatient setting. cAcute liver injury is defined as (1) inpatient or outpatient alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase >200 U/L; (2) a total bilirubin >2 times the upper limit of normal and an INR ≥1.5 in an inpatient or outpatient setting; or (3) inpatient INR ≥1.5 and either hepatic encephalopathy or liver transplantation in the absence of chronic liver disease. KPNC, Kaiser Permanente Northern California; VACS, Veterans Aging Cohort Study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Comparative risk of liver aminotransferase levels >200 U/L among users of different nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) combinations (Model A), antiretroviral classes (Model B), and antiretroviral regimens (Model C). a“Other” includes regimens with <2 NRTIs or alternative NRTI combinations than those listed. bEach model adjusted for baseline alanine aminotransferase >40 U/L, calendar year of antiretroviral therapy initiation, and data source. cOther refers to regimens with none or >1 of the listed antiretroviral class. ABC, abacavir; ATV/r, boosted atazanvir; DRV/r, boosted darunavir; EFV, efavirenz; FTC, emtricitabine; INSTI, integrase inhibitor; LPV/r, boosted lopinavir; PI, protease inhibitor; TDF, tenofovir; ZDV, zidovudine; 3TC, lamivudine.

References

    1. Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration. Life expectancy of individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy in high-income countries: a collaborative analysis of 14 cohort studies. Lancet 2008; 372:293–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyd MA. Improvements in antiretroviral therapy outcomes over calendar time. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2009; 4:194–9. - PubMed
    1. Katlama C Esposito R Gatell JM et al. Efficacy and safety of TMC114/ritonavir in treatment-experienced HIV patients: 24-week results of POWER 1. AIDS 2007; 21:395–402. - PubMed
    1. Lennox JL DeJesus E Lazzarin A et al. Safety and efficacy of raltegravir-based versus efavirenz-based combination therapy in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection: a multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 374:796–806. - PubMed
    1. Squires K Lazzarin A Gatell JM et al. Comparison of once-daily atazanavir with efavirenz, each in combination with fixed-dose zidovudine and lamivudine, as initial therapy for patients infected with HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004; 36:1011–9. - PubMed