Gastroesophageal reflux after peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter case-control study
- PMID: 28472834
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-105485
Gastroesophageal reflux after peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter case-control study
Abstract
Background and study aims The variables associated with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are largely unknown. This study aimed to: 1) identify the prevalence of reflux esophagitis and asymptomatic GER in patients who underwent POEM, and 2) evaluate patient and intraprocedural variables associated with post-POEM GER. Patients and methods All patients who underwent POEM and subsequent objective testing for GER (pH study with or without upper gastrointestinal [GI] endoscopy) at seven tertiary academic centers (one Asian, two US, four European) were included. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) DeMeester score ≥ 14.72 (cases) and 2) DeMeester score of < 14.72 (controls). Asymptomatic GER was defined as a patient with a DeMeester score ≥ 14.72 who was not consuming proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Results A total of 282 patients (female 48.2 %, Caucasian 84.8 %; mean body mass index 24.1 kg/m2) were included. Clinical success was achieved in 94.3 % of patients. GER evaluation was completed after a median follow-up of 12 months (interquartile range 10 - 24 months). A DeMeester score of ≥ 14.72 was seen in 57.8 % of patients. Multivariable analysis revealed female sex to be the only independent association (odds ratio 1.69, 95 % confidence interval 1.04 - 2.74) with post-POEM GER. No intraprocedural variables were associated with GER. Upper GI endoscopy was available in 233 patients, 54 (23.2 %) of whom were noted to have reflux esophagitis (majority Los Angeles Grade A or B). GER was asymptomatic in 60.1 %. Conclusion Post-POEM GER was seen in the majority of patients. No intraprocedural variables were identified to allow for potential alteration in procedural technique.
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Dr. Khashab is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Olympus America, and has received research support from Cook Medical. Dr Kumbhari is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Apollo Endosurgery.
Comment in
-
Will Reflux Kill POEM?Endoscopy. 2017 Jul;49(7):625-628. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-112490. Epub 2017 Jun 28. Endoscopy. 2017. PMID: 28658688 No abstract available.
-
[French comment on article Gastroesophageal reflux after peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter case-control study1].Endoscopy. 2017 Jul;49(7):726. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-112737. Epub 2017 Jun 28. Endoscopy. 2017. PMID: 28658695 French. No abstract available.
-
Should we focus on the fight against achalasia or equivocal results of reflux after peroral endoscopic myotomy?Endoscopy. 2017 Dec;49(12):1282. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119639. Epub 2017 Nov 29. Endoscopy. 2017. PMID: 29186734 No abstract available.
-
Gastroesophageal reflux after peroral endoscopic myotomy.Endoscopy. 2017 Dec;49(12):1283. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121145. Epub 2017 Nov 29. Endoscopy. 2017. PMID: 29186735 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Eleftheriadis and to Sharma et al.Endoscopy. 2017 Dec;49(12):1284. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-122071. Epub 2017 Nov 29. Endoscopy. 2017. PMID: 29186736 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical