Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2017 May;92(5):719-725.
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.01.021.

Ethical Analysis of Withdrawing Total Artificial Heart Support

Erin S DeMartino  1 , Sara E Wordingham  2 , John M Stulak  3 , Barry A Boilson  4 , Kayla R Fuechtmann  5 , Nausheen Singh  6 , Daniel P Sulmasy  7 , Octavio E Pajaro  8 , Paul S Mueller  9
Affiliations
Case Reports

Ethical Analysis of Withdrawing Total Artificial Heart Support

Erin S DeMartino et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 May.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the characteristics of patients who undergo withdrawal of total artificial heart support and to explore the ethical aspects of withdrawing this life-sustaining treatment.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all adult recipients of a total artificial heart at Mayo Clinic from the program's inception in 2007 through June 30, 2015. Management of other life-sustaining therapies, approach to end-of-life decision making, engagement of ethics and palliative care consultation, and causes of death were analyzed.

Results: Of 47 total artificial heart recipients, 14 patients or their surrogates (30%) requested withdrawal of total artificial heart support. No request was denied by treatment teams. All 14 patients were supported with at least 1 other life-sustaining therapy. Only 1 patient was able to participate in decision making.

Conclusion: It is widely held to be ethically permissible to withdraw a life-sustaining treatment when the treatment no longer meets the patient's health care-related goals (ie, the burdens outweigh the benefits). These data suggest that some patients, surrogates, physicians, and other care providers believe that this principle extends to the withdrawal of total artificial heart support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: None.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Total Artificial Heart and Driver Consoles. (Used with permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cohn WE, Timms DL, Frazier OH. Total artificial hearts: past, present, and future. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12(10):609–617. - PubMed
    1. DeVries WC, Anderson JL, Joyce LD, et al. Clinical use of the total artificial heart. N Engl J Med. 1984;310(5):273–278. - PubMed
    1. Nose Y. Toward a totally implantable artificial heart: development status at Cleveland Clinic. In: Akutsu T, Koyanagi H, Anderson JM, et al., editors. Artificial Heart 3: proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Artificial Heart and Assist Devices. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo: Springer Japan; Feb 16–17, 1990. pp. 147–165. c1991.
    1. Rachels J. Barney Clark’s key. Hastings Cent Rep. 1983;13(2):17–19. - PubMed
    1. Commercial Appeal (Memphis, TN). 1982 Dec 5: pg 3. Quoted by: Rachels J. Barney Clark’s key. Hastings Cent Rep. 1983;13(2):17–19. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms