Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May;14(5S):S138-S153.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.030.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Evaluation of Nipple Discharge

Affiliations
Review

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Evaluation of Nipple Discharge

Expert Panel on Breast Imaging: et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 May.

Abstract

Appropriate imaging evaluation of nipple discharge depends the nature of the discharge. Imaging is not indicated for women with physiologic nipple discharge. For evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge, multiple breast imaging modalities are rated for evidence-based appropriateness under various scenarios. For women age 40 or older, mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) should be the initial examination. Ultrasound is usually added as a complementary examination, with some exceptions. For women age 30 to 39, either mammogram or ultrasound may be used as the initial examination on the basis of institutional preference. For women age 30 or younger, ultrasound should be the initial examination, with mammography/DBT added when ultrasound shows suspicious findings or if the patient is predisposed to developing breast cancer. For men age 25 or older, mammography/DBT should be performed initially, with ultrasound added as indicated, given the high incidence of breast cancer in men with pathologic nipple discharge. Although MRI and ductography are not usually appropriate as initial examinations, each may be useful when the initial standard imaging evaluation is negative. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Keywords: AUC; Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; breast MRI; breast ultrasound; digital breast tomosynthesis; ductography; mammography; nipple discharge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Evaluation of Nipple Discharge: 2022 Update.
    Expert Panel on Breast Imaging; Sanford MF, Slanetz PJ, Lewin AA, Baskies AM, Bozzuto L, Branton SA, Hayward JH, Le-Petross HT, Newell MS, Scheel JR, Sharpe RE Jr, Ulaner GA, Weinstein SP, Moy L. Expert Panel on Breast Imaging, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2022 Nov;19(11S):S304-S318. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.020. J Am Coll Radiol. 2022. PMID: 36436958
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Breast Pain.
    Expert Panel on Breast Imaging:; Jokich PM, Bailey L, D'Orsi C, Green ED, Holbrook AI, Lee SJ, Lourenco AP, Mainiero MB, Moy L, Sepulveda KA, Slanetz PJ, Trikha S, Yepes MM, Newell MS. Expert Panel on Breast Imaging:, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 May;14(5S):S25-S33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.028. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017. PMID: 28473081 Review.
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Breast Pain.
    Expert Panel on Breast Imaging:; Holbrook AI, Moy L, Akin EA, Baron P, Didwania AD, Heller SL, Le-Petross HT, Lewin AA, Lourenco AP, Mehta TS, Niell BL, Slanetz PJ, Stuckey AR, Tuscano DS, Vincoff NS, Weinstein SP, Newell MS. Expert Panel on Breast Imaging:, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Nov;15(11S):S276-S282. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.014. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018. PMID: 30392596
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Breast Implant Evaluation.
    Expert Panel on Breast Imaging:; Lourenco AP, Moy L, Baron P, Didwania AD, diFlorio RM, Heller SL, Holbrook AI, Lewin AA, Mehta TS, Niell BL, Slanetz PJ, Stuckey AR, Tuscano DS, Vincoff NS, Weinstein SP, Newell MS. Expert Panel on Breast Imaging:, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 May;15(5S):S13-S25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.009. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29724416
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Palpable Breast Masses: 2022 Update.
    Expert Panel on Breast Imaging; Klein KA, Kocher M, Lourenco AP, Niell BL, Bennett DL, Chetlen A, Freer P, Ivansco LK, Jochelson MS, Kremer ME, Malak SF, McCrary M, Mehta TS, Neal CH, Porpiglia A, Ulaner GA, Moy L. Expert Panel on Breast Imaging, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 May;20(5S):S146-S163. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.013. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37236740 Review.

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources