Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May;45(5):299-308.
doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 May 1.

[Does fertility treatment increase the risk of breast cancer? Current knowledge and meta-analysis]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
Review

[Does fertility treatment increase the risk of breast cancer? Current knowledge and meta-analysis]

[Article in French]
V Gabriele et al. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2017 May.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review was to assess the level of risk of breast cancer for women exposed to ovulation-inducing therapy (OIT).

Methods: The 25 selected studies were extracted from the PUBMED database from January 2000 until March 2016 with the following key-words: "fertility agents", "infertility treatments", "clomiphene citrate", "buserelin", "ovarian stimulation", "assisted reproductive technology" and "breast cancer". Our meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software, Cochrane Collaboration, 2014. The results were calculated by type of OIT, as well as globally.

Results: The analysis of these published epidemiological studies confirms that exposition to OIT is not a breast cancer risk factor, but the results are contradictory. Two studies have shown a significantly increased risk of breast cancer in a population of infertile women, while two others have found a significant decrease of this risk. The twenty others did not show any impact of IOT over this risk. Our meta-analysis of 20 selected studies has not identified a significant association between exposition to OIT and breast cancer risk (relative risk=0,96; IC 95: (0,81-1,14) for cohort studies and odds ratio=0,94; IC 95% (0,81-1,10) for case-control studies).

Conclusion: Exposition to OIT is not an identified risk factor for breast cancer. A message reassuring about a possible risk of OIT-related breast cancer should be given to these women. Exposition to OIT is therefore not an indication of increased breast surveillance.

Keywords: Assistance médicale a la procréation; Assisted reproductive technology; Breast cancer; Cancer du sein; Fécondation in vitro; In vitro fertilization; Meta-analysis; Méta-analyse; Ovulation-inducing therapy; Traitements inducteurs de l’ovulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources