Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov;58(11):1793-1796.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.192450. Epub 2017 May 4.

Most of the Intended Management Changes After 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Are Implemented

Affiliations

Most of the Intended Management Changes After 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Are Implemented

Jeremie Calais et al. J Nucl Med. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

In this prospective referring-physician-based survey, we investigated the definite clinical impact of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT on managing patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Methods: We prospectively studied 130 patients with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT referred for initial or subsequent management decisions (NCT02174679). Referring physicians completed one questionnaire before the scan (Q1) to indicate the treatment plan without PET/CT information, one immediately after review of the imaging report to denote intended management changes (Q2), and one 6 mo later (Q3) to verify whether intended changes were in fact implemented. To further validate the Q3 responses, a systematic electronic chart review was conducted. Results: All 3 questionnaires were completed by referring physicians for 96 of 130 patients (74%). 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT resulted in intended management changes (Q2) in 48 of 96 patients (50%). These changes were finally implemented (Q3) in 36 of 48 patients (75%). Q3 responses were confirmed in all patients with an available electronic chart (36/96; 38%). Conclusion: This prospective study confirmed a significant impact of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT on the intended management of patients with NETs (50% of changes) and notably demonstrated a high implementation rate (75%) of these intended management changes.

Keywords: DOTATATE; PET/CT; impact on implemented management; neuroendocrine tumors; somatostatin receptor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Patient flowchart for inclusion and management change.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Example 62-y-old man referred for initial staging of metastatic small-bowel low-grade NET. CT and MRI showed mesenteric mass, enlarged abdominal lymph nodes, and equivocal liver lesions (hemangiomas vs. metastases). He had prior slightly increased level of 24-h urine 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, supporting suspicion of hepatic metastases. Referring physician indicated in Q1 that patient was being considered for octreotide treatment. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT ruled out hepatic metastasis (yellow arrows) and confirmed mesenteric primary site and lymph node involvement (red arrows), as seen on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET maximum-intensity projection (A), fused 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT axial views (B and D), and corresponding CT axial views (C and E). In Q2, referring physician indicated intended management change toward surgery, which was confirmed later in Q3. Patient finally underwent resection of small-bowel NET with wide margins. Follow-up MRI and urinary carcinoid biomarker showed no disease recurrence.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fendler WP, Barrio M, Spick C, et al. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT interobserver agreement for neuroendocrine tumor assessment: results of a prospective study on 50 patients. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:307–311. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrio M, Czernin J, Fanti S, et al. The impact of somatostatin receptor–directed PET/CT on the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nucl Med. 2017:58:756–761. - PubMed
    1. Herrmann K, Czernin J, Wolin EM, et al. Impact of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT on the management of neuroendocrine tumors: the referring physician’s perspective. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:70–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Liu D, et al. Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) alone on expected management of patients with cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2155–2161. - PubMed
    1. Levine MN, Julian JA. Registries that show efficacy: good, but not good enough. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5316–5319. - PubMed

Associated data