Quality of Life Measurements: Any Value for Clinical Practice?

Abstract

Quality of life measurements are well established in cancer clinical trials. In daily clinical practice, where cancer patients often suffer from disease-specific symptoms and report unmet needs regarding their treatment, these measurements are not systematically implemented. The systematic (often computer-based) assessment of quality of life in daily cancer care has shown to be beneficial for patient-physician communication, symptom management, shared decision-making, and in creating a learning health system. Unfortunately, to date, routine electronic quality of life assessments are usually limited to large cancer facilities. Patient and physician barriers as well as barriers from the administrative side in particular are currently hindering the implementation of these systems into the broad spectrum of clinical cancer care. Cost-effectiveness analyses of existing systems, the inclusion of all relevant stakeholders, and clear implementation guidelines are required to introduce quality of life measurements in clinical cancer practice to improve the treatment of cancer survivors and to create a health care system that addresses all their disease-related needs.

Keywords: Clinical practice; Implementation; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of life.