Challenges and opportunities for the future of monoclonal antibody development: Improving safety assessment and reducing animal use
- PMID: 28475417
- PMCID: PMC5524158
- DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2017.1324376
Challenges and opportunities for the future of monoclonal antibody development: Improving safety assessment and reducing animal use
Abstract
The market for biotherapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is large and is growing rapidly. However, attrition poses a significant challenge for the development of mAbs, and for biopharmaceuticals in general, with large associated costs in resource and animal use. Termination of candidate mAbs may occur due to poor translation from preclinical models to human safety. It is critical that the industry addresses this problem to maintain productivity. Though attrition poses a significant challenge for pharmaceuticals in general, there are specific challenges related to the development of antibody-based products. Due to species specificity, non-human primates (NHP) are frequently the only pharmacologically relevant species for nonclinical safety and toxicology testing for the majority of antibody-based products, and therefore, as more mAbs are developed, increased NHP use is anticipated. The integration of new and emerging in vitro and in silico technologies, e.g., cell- and tissue-based approaches, systems pharmacology and modeling, have the potential to improve the human safety prediction and the therapeutic mAb development process, while reducing and refining animal use simultaneously. In 2014, to engage in open discussion about the challenges and opportunities for the future of mAb development, a workshop was held with over 60 regulators and experts in drug development, mechanistic toxicology and emerging technologies to discuss this issue. The workshop used industry case-studies to discuss the value of the in vivo studies and identify opportunities for in vitro technologies in human safety assessment. From these and continuing discussions it is clear that there are opportunities to improve safety assessment in mAb development using non-animal technologies, potentially reducing future attrition, and there is a shared desire to reduce animal use through minimised study design and reduced numbers of studies.
Keywords: 3Rs; Attrition; in vitro technologies; monoclonal antibodies (mAbs); safety assessment.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Considerations regarding nonhuman primate use in safety assessment of biopharmaceuticals.Int J Toxicol. 2011 Oct;30(5):583-90. doi: 10.1177/1091581811415875. Int J Toxicol. 2011. PMID: 22013138 Review.
-
Safety testing of monoclonal antibodies in non-human primates: Case studies highlighting their impact on human risk assessment.MAbs. 2018 Jan;10(1):1-17. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2017.1389364. Epub 2017 Oct 26. MAbs. 2018. PMID: 28991509 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immunogenicity of mAbs in non-human primates during nonclinical safety assessment.MAbs. 2013 Sep-Oct;5(5):810-6. doi: 10.4161/mabs.25234. Epub 2013 Jun 6. MAbs. 2013. PMID: 23924803 Free PMC article.
-
Nonclinical Development of Biologics: Integrating Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics to Create Smarter and More Flexible Nonclinical Safety Programs Optimizing Animal Use.Int J Toxicol. 2021 May-Jun;40(3):270-284. doi: 10.1177/1091581821994288. Epub 2021 Feb 25. Int J Toxicol. 2021. PMID: 33631988
-
The use of recovery animals in nonclinical safety assessment studies with monoclonal antibodies: further 3Rs opportunities remain.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 Feb;138:105339. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105339. Epub 2023 Jan 14. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 36649820 Review.
Cited by
-
Off-target binding of an anti-amyloid beta monoclonal antibody to platelet factor 4 causes acute and chronic toxicity in cynomolgus monkeys.MAbs. 2021 Jan-Dec;13(1):1887628. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2021.1887628. MAbs. 2021. PMID: 33596779 Free PMC article.
-
An approved in vitro approach to preclinical safety and efficacy evaluation of engineered T cell receptor anti-CD3 bispecific (ImmTAC) molecules.PLoS One. 2018 Oct 15;13(10):e0205491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205491. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30321203 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Definition of "Similar Toxicities": Case Studies Illustrating Industry and Regulatory Interpretation of ICH S6(R1) for Long-Term Toxicity Studies in One or Two Species.Int J Toxicol. 2022 May-Jun;41(3):171-181. doi: 10.1177/10915818221081439. Epub 2022 Apr 18. Int J Toxicol. 2022. PMID: 35435047 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Human Use of Monoclonal Antibodies Against Critical Bacteria: A Scoping Review of Clinical Trials.Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Aug;14(8):1619-1647. doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01195-2. Epub 2025 Jul 25. Infect Dis Ther. 2025. PMID: 40715971 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Monoclonal Antibodies in Dermatooncology-State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Cancers (Basel). 2019 Sep 24;11(10):1420. doi: 10.3390/cancers11101420. Cancers (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31554169 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Mullard A. 2015 FDA drug approvals. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2016; 15(2):73–6; PMID:26837582; https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.15 - DOI - PubMed
-
- EMA European public assessment reports, human medicines [Internet]. The European Medicines Agency [cited 2016 October 19]. 2016. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl = pages%2Fmedicines%2Flandin....
-
- FDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration Press Release. 6March2015: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm436648.htm. 2015.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources