Prognostic significance of marital status in breast cancer survival: A population-based study
- PMID: 28475579
- PMCID: PMC5419505
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175515
Prognostic significance of marital status in breast cancer survival: A population-based study
Abstract
Research shows that married cancer patients have lower mortality than unmarried patients but few data exist for breast cancer. We assessed total mortality associated with marital status, with attention to differences by race/ethnicity, tumor subtype, and neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES). We included, from the population-based California Cancer Registry, women ages 18 and older with invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 2005 and 2012 with follow-up through December 2013. We estimated mortality rate ratios (MRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for total mortality by nSES, race/ethnicity, and tumor subtype. Among 145,564 breast cancer cases, 42.7% were unmarried at the time of diagnosis. In multivariable-adjusted models, the MRR (95% CI) for unmarried compared to married women was 1.28 (1.24-1.32) for total mortality. Significant interactions were observed by race/ethnicity (P<0.001), tumor subtype (P<0.001), and nSES (P = 0.009). Higher MRRs were observed for non-Hispanic whites and Asians/Pacific Islanders than for blacks or Hispanics, and for HR+/HER2+ tumors than other subtypes. Assessment of interactive effect between marital status and nSES showed that unmarried women living in low SES neighborhoods had a higher risk of dying compared with married women in high SES neighborhoods (MRR = 1.60; 95% CI: 1.53-1.67). Unmarried breast cancer patients have higher total mortality than married patients; the association varies by race/ethnicity, tumor subtype, and nSES. Unmarried status should be further evaluated as a breast cancer prognostic factor. Identification of underlying causes of the marital status associations is needed to design interventions that could improve survival for unmarried breast cancer patients.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Pinquart M, Duberstein PR. Associations of social networks with cancer mortality: a meta-analysis. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology. 2010;75(2):122–37. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.06.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gomez SL, Hurley S, Canchola AJ, Keegan THM, Cheng I, Murphy JD, et al. Effects of marital status and economic resources on survival after cancer: A population-based study. Cancer. 2016;122(10):1618–25. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29885 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Martinez ME, Anderson K, Murphy JD, Hurley S, Canchola AJ, Keegan TH, et al. Differences in marital status and mortality by race/ethnicity and nativity among California cancer patients. Cancer. 2016;122(10):1570–8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29886 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Parikh DA, Chudasama R, Agarwal A, Rand A, Qureshi MM, Ngo T, et al. Race/Ethnicity, Primary Language, and Income Are Not Demographic Drivers of Mortality in Breast Cancer Patients at a Diverse Safety Net Academic Medical Center. International journal of breast cancer. 2015;2015:835074 doi: 10.1155/2015/835074 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
