The Growing Need for Validated Biomarkers and Endpoints for Dry Eye Clinical Research
- PMID: 28475698
- PMCID: PMC5455411
- DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-21709
The Growing Need for Validated Biomarkers and Endpoints for Dry Eye Clinical Research
Abstract
Purpose: Biomarkers with minimally invasive and reproducible objective metrics provide the key to future paradigm shifts in understanding of the underlying causes of dry eye disease (DED) and approaches to treatment of DED. We review biomarkers and their validity in providing objective metrics for DED clinical research and patient care.
Methods: The English-language literature in PubMed primarily over the last decade was surveyed for studies related to identification of biomarkers of DED: (1) inflammation, (2) point-of-care, (3) ocular imaging, and (4) genetics. Relevant studies in each group were individually evaluated for (1) methodological and analytical details, (2) data and concordance with other similar studies, and (3) potential to serve as validated biomarkers with objective metrics.
Results: Significant work has been done to identify biomarkers for DED clinical trials and for patient care. Interstudy variation among studies dealing with the same biomarker type was high. This could be attributed to biologic variations and/or differences in processing, and data analysis. Correlation with other signs and symptoms of DED was not always clear or present.
Conclusions: Many of the biomarkers reviewed show the potential to serve as validated and objective metrics for clinical research and patient care in DED. Interstudy variation for a given biomarker emphasizes the need for detailed reporting of study methodology, including information on subject characteristics, quality control, processing, and analysis methods to optimize development of nonsubjective metrics. Biomarker development offers a rich opportunity to significantly move forward clinical research and patient care in DED.
Overview: DED is an unmet medical need - a chronic pain syndrome associated with variable vision that affects quality of life, is common with advancing age, interferes with the comfortable use of contact lenses, and can diminish results of eye surgeries, such as cataract extraction, LASIK, and glaucoma procedures. It is a worldwide medical challenge with a prevalence rate ranging from 8% to 50%. Many clinicians and researchers across the globe are searching for better answers to understand the mechanisms related to the development and chronicity of DED. Though there have been many clinical trials for DED, few new treatments have emerged over the last decade. Biomarkers may provide the needed breakthrough to propel our understanding of DED to the next level and the potential to realize our goal of truly personalized medicine based on scientific evidence. Clinical trials and research on DED have suffered from the lack of validated biomarkers and less than objective and reproducible endpoints. Current work on biomarkers has provided the groundwork to move forward. This review highlights primarily ocular biomarkers that have been investigated for use in DED, discusses the methodologic outcomes in providing objective metrics for clinical research, and suggests recommendations for further work.
Similar articles
-
Tear cytokine profile as a noninvasive biomarker of inflammation for ocular surface diseases: standard operating procedures.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Dec 23;54(13):8327-36. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12132. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013. PMID: 24204044 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Development and content validity assessment of the Dry Eye Disease Questionnaire in patients with dry eye disease, meibomian gland dysfunction, and Sjögren's syndrome dry eye disease.J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Jul 5;7(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00608-5. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023. PMID: 37405617 Free PMC article.
-
Defining Dry Eye from a Clinical Perspective.Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Dec 4;21(23):9271. doi: 10.3390/ijms21239271. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. PMID: 33291796 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tear Proteomics Study of Dry Eye Disease: Which Eye Do You Adopt as the Representative Eye for the Study?Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jan 3;22(1):422. doi: 10.3390/ijms22010422. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID: 33401599 Free PMC article.
-
Dry eye disease and proteomics.Ocul Surf. 2022 Apr;24:119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Mar 9. Ocul Surf. 2022. PMID: 35278720 Review.
Cited by
-
Commentary: Meibomian gland dysfunction: Taking a deep dive into the ocular surface parameters.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 May;70(5):1548. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_742_22. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35502023 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Role of tear film biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of dry eye disease.Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep 12;9(3):150-159. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_56_19. eCollection 2019 Jul-Sep. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31572651 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Label-Free Detection of Tear Biomarkers Using Hydrogel-Coated Gold Nanoshells in a Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance-Based Biosensor.ACS Nano. 2018 Sep 25;12(9):9342-9354. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b04348. Epub 2018 Sep 14. ACS Nano. 2018. PMID: 30204412 Free PMC article.
-
Biomarkers of chronic inflammation in disease development and prevention: challenges and opportunities.Nat Immunol. 2017 Oct 18;18(11):1175-1180. doi: 10.1038/ni.3828. Nat Immunol. 2017. PMID: 29044245 No abstract available.
-
Ocular Surface Workup in Patients with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Treated with Intense Regulated Pulsed Light.Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Oct 13;9(4):147. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9040147. Diagnostics (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31614910 Free PMC article.
References
-
- The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007; 5: 75–92. - PubMed
-
- Tsubota K,, Yokoi N,, Shimazaki J,, et al. New perspectives on dry eye definition and diagnosis: a consensus report by the Asia Dry Eye Society. Ocul Surf. 2017; 15: 65–76. - PubMed
-
- Vehof J,, Sillevis Smitt-Kamminga N,, Nibourg SA,, Hammond CJ. Predictors of discordance between symptoms and signs in dry eye disease. Ophthalmology. 2016; 124: 280–286. - PubMed
-
- Onwubiko SN,, Eze BI,, Udeh NN,, Onwasigwe EN,, Umeh RE. Dry eye disease: concordance between the diagnostic tests in African eyes. Eye Contact Lens. 2016; 42: 395–400. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources