Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 5;19(5):e110.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.7326.

Ethics Considerations in Global Mobile Phone-Based Surveys of Noncommunicable Diseases: A Conceptual Exploration

Joseph Ali  1   2 , Alain B Labrique  2 , Kara Gionfriddo  1 , George Pariyo  2 , Dustin G Gibson  2 , Bridget Pratt  2   3 , Molly Deutsch-Feldman  4 , Adnan A Hyder  1   2
Affiliations

Ethics Considerations in Global Mobile Phone-Based Surveys of Noncommunicable Diseases: A Conceptual Exploration

Joseph Ali et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Mobile phone coverage has grown, particularly within low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), presenting an opportunity to augment routine health surveillance programs. Several LMICs and global health partners are seeking opportunities to launch basic mobile phone-based surveys of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). The increasing use of such technology in LMICs brings forth a cluster of ethical challenges; however, much of the existing literature regarding the ethics of mobile or digital health focuses on the use of technologies in high-income countries and does not consider directly the specific ethical issues associated with the conduct of mobile phone surveys (MPS) for NCD risk factor surveillance in LMICs. In this paper, we explore conceptually several of the central ethics issues in this domain, which mainly track the three phases of the MPS process: predata collection, during data collection, and postdata collection. These include identifying the nature of the activity; stakeholder engagement; appropriate design; anticipating and managing potential harms and benefits; consent; reaching intended respondents; data ownership, access and use; and ensuring LMIC sustainability. We call for future work to develop an ethics framework and guidance for the use of mobile phones for disease surveillance globally.

Keywords: bioethics; ethics; mHealth; mobile phone survey; noncommunicable diseases; research ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Nsubuga P, White M, Thacker S, Anderson M, Blount S, Broome C, Chiller T, Espitia V, Imtiaz R, Sosin D, Stroup D, Tauxe R, Vijayaraghavan M, Trostle M. Public health surveillance: a tool for targeting and monitoring interventions. In: Jamison D, Breman J, Measham A, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans D, Jha P, Mills A, Musgrov P, editors. Disease control priorities in developing countries, 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. a.
    1. Croke K, Dabalen A, Demombynes G, Giugale M, Hoogeveen J. Collecting high frequency panel data in Africa using mobile phone interviews. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 2012;1:1–27. doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-6097. - DOI
    1. Gibson DG, Pereira A, Farrenkopf BA, Labrique AB, Pariyo GW, Hyder AA. Mobile phone surveys for collecting population-level estimates in low- and middle-income countries: a literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(5):e139. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7428. http://www.jmir.org/2017/5/e139 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hyder A, Wosu A, Gibson D, Labrique A, Ali J, Pariyo G. Noncommunicable disease risk factors and mobile phones: a proposed research agenda. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(5):e133. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7246. http://www.jmir.org/2017/5/e133 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ballivian A, Azevedo J, Durbin W. Using mobile phones for high-frequency data collection. In: Toninelli D, Pinter R, de Pedraza P, editors. Mobile research methods: opportunities and challenges of mobile research methodologies. London: Ubiquity Press; 2015. p. e.