Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;26(2):605-614.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4554-2. Epub 2017 May 5.

There is no difference between quadriceps- and hamstring tendon autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 2-year patient-reported outcome study

Affiliations

There is no difference between quadriceps- and hamstring tendon autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 2-year patient-reported outcome study

Armin Runer et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is crucial, however the optimal graft source remains a topic of controversy. The purpose of this study is to compare subjective and functional patient-reported outcomes (PRO) after single-bundle ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon (QT) or hamstring tendon (HT) autografts for single-bundle ACL reconstruction. We hypothesize that there is no difference in patient-reported functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction using either HT- or QT autograft.

Methods: All data were extracted from a prospectively collected ACL registry. A total of 80 patients with at least 2-year follow-up were included in this study. A total of 40 patients with primary ACL reconstruction using a QT autograft harvested via a minimally invasive technique were matched by sex, age and pre-injury Tegner and Lysholm score to 40 patients who received HT autografts. Subjective and functional PRO scores including Lysholm score, Tegner activity level and visual analogue scale for pain were obtained at 6, 12 and 24 months after index surgery.

Results: No significant difference between the QT and the HT group was seen at any follow-up in regard to any of the PRO scores for function or pain. 24 months post-surgery the mean Tegner activity score of the HT group was significantly (p = 0.04) lower compared to the pre-injury status. At final follow-up, 27 patients (67.5%) in the QT group and 32 patients (80.0%) in the HT returned to their pre-injury activity level (n.s.). A total of 37 patients (92.5%) of the QT cohort and 35 patients (87.5%) of the HT cohort reported "good" or "excellent" results according to the Lysholm score (n.s.). "No pain" or "slight pain" during severe exertion was reported by 33 patients (82.5%) with QT autograft and 28 patients (82.4%) with HT autograft (n.s.).

Conclusion: There is no significant difference between PRO 2 years post-operative using either QT or HT autografts. Both QT and HT grafts show acceptable and comparable PRO scores making the QT a reliable graft alternative to HT for primary ACL reconstruction.

Level of evidence: III.

Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior knee pain; Hamstring tendon; Patient-reported outcome; Quadriceps tendon.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arthroscopy. 2014 May;30(5):593-8 - PubMed
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996;4(2):100-10 - PubMed
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2004 Apr-May;32(3):629-34 - PubMed
    1. Arthrosc Tech. 2014 Aug 11;3(4):e509-13 - PubMed
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Sep;33(9):1337-45 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources