Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun:818:1-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

Entrance surface dose and induced DNA damage in blood lymphocytes of patients exposed to low-dose and low-dose-rate X-irradiation during diagnostic and therapeutic interventional radiology procedures

Affiliations

Entrance surface dose and induced DNA damage in blood lymphocytes of patients exposed to low-dose and low-dose-rate X-irradiation during diagnostic and therapeutic interventional radiology procedures

Safa Abdul Syed Basheerudeen et al. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

The ionizing radiation received by patients and health workers due to radiological imaging may increase the risks of radiation effects, such as cancer and cataracts. We have investigated the dose received by specific areas around the head and related this to DNA damage in the blood lymphocytes of subjects exposed to interventional imaging. The entrance surface doses (ESD) to the forehead, neck, and shoulder were measured with a thermoluminescence dosimeter (CaSO4 disc or polycrystalline powder of lithium tetraborate doped with Mn) and compared with that of dose area product (DAP). DNA damage was measured by γ-H2AX, p53ser15, chromosomal aberration (CA), and micronucleus (MN) assays in lymphocytes of patients (n=75), before and 2 and 24h after exposure. The measured ESD values were 230.5±4.9, 189.5±3.55 and 90.7±3.4mGy for the forehead, neck, and shoulder, respectively. The DAP varied from 1.8 to 2047 Gy*cm2, showing a correlation with fluoroscopy time (r=0.417). Received doses did not increase early markers of DNA damage (γ-H2AX and p53ser15 assays), but residual damage (CA and MN frequencies) showed a significant (p<0.001) increase at 2 and 24h post-exposure compared to pre-imaging, despite poor correlation with DAP (r=0.1). Our results show that interventional imaging procedures deliver significant radiation doses and induce measurable DNA damage in lymphocytes of subjects, highlighting the need for rigorous patient safety protocols.

Keywords: DNA damage; Interventional radiology; Low-dose radiation; TLD.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources