Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 1;10(1):25-36.
doi: 10.70252/MNVP1390. eCollection 2017.

The Effect of Military Load Carriage on Postural Sway, Forward Trunk Lean, and Pelvic Girdle Motion

Eileen M Strube  1 , Andrea Sumner  1 , Roger Kollock  2 , Kenneth E Games  3 , Marie A Lackamp  1 , Masahiro Mizutani  1 , Joellen M Sefton  1
Affiliations

The Effect of Military Load Carriage on Postural Sway, Forward Trunk Lean, and Pelvic Girdle Motion

Eileen M Strube et al. Int J Exerc Sci. .

Abstract

Musculoskeletal injuries are a common occurrence in military service members. It is believed that the load carried by the service member impedes stability and alters back and pelvis kinematics, increasing their susceptibility to musculoskeletal injuries, specifically in the lower extremities. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of two different loads on postural sway, forward trunk lean, and pelvic girdle motion in United States Army Cadets. Twenty male Army Reserve Officers' Training Corps Cadets participated in this study. Each participant performed the Modified Clinical Testing of Sensory Interaction (mCTSIB) Protocol and the Unilateral Stance (ULS) Protocol under three different rucksack load conditions (unloaded, 16.0 kg, and 20.5 kg loads). Mean postural sway velocity was recorded along with 2-D kinematics of the trunk in the sagittal plane and the pelvis in the frontal and sagittal planes. External loads of 16.0 kg (p < 0.001) and 20.5 kg (p ≤ 0.003) significantly increased mean sway velocity by 16% to 52% depending on stance and visual condition, but did not produce significant changes in trunk and pelvic kinematics.

Keywords: ARMY; Spine; balance; motion analysis; stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sagittal view (Dartfish®)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagram of testing procedures; A) Modified Clinical Testing of Sensory Interaction (mCTSIB) Protocol and B) Unilateral Stance (ULS) Protocol (note: T= test order)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Frontal view (Dartfish®)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. 21-18 F. Field Manual: Foot Marches. Washington, DC: Department of the Army; 1990.
    1. Al-Khabbaz YS, Shimada T, Hasegawa M. The effect of backpack heaviness on trunk-lower extremity muscle activities and trunk posture. Gait Posture. 2008;28(2):297–302. - PubMed
    1. Angin S, Ilcin N, Yesilyaprak SS, Simsek IE. Prediction of postural sway velocity by foot posture index, foot size and plantar pressure values in unilateral stance. Eklem hastaliklari ve cerrahisi = Joint diseases & related surgery. 2013;24(3):144–8. - PubMed
    1. Attwells RL, Birrell SA, Hooper RH, Mansfield NJ. Influence of carrying heavy loads on soldiers’ posture, movements and gait. Ergonomics. 2006;49(14):1527–37. - PubMed
    1. Benoit DL, Ramsey DK, Lamontagne M, Xu L, Wretenberg P, Renström P. Effect of skin movement artifact on knee kinematics during gait and cutting motions measured in vivo. Gait Posture. 2006;24(2):152–64. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources