Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;5(7):154.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.28.

Theoretical diagnosis of emphysema by aerosol bolus inhalation

Affiliations

Theoretical diagnosis of emphysema by aerosol bolus inhalation

Robert Sturm. Ann Transl Med. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The present contribution deals with the theoretical description of aerosol bolus dispersion in lungs being affected by different manifestations of emphysema. The work constructs the hypothesis that each manifestation of emphysema exhibits specific properties with regard to the dispersion of inhaled and exhaled aerosol boluses as well as the deposition of particles from the aerosol pulse.

Methods: For an appropriate simulation of single emphysematous manifestations, a previously developed model assuming (I) a random variation of alveolar diameters, (II) an exact localization of diseased structures, and (III) a realistic balance between alveolar air volume and number of air sacs was applied. Dispersion of inhaled and exhaled aerosol boluses was simulated by using the mathematical concept of effective diffusivities. Computations were conducted for an average adult lung (FRC =3,300 mL), symmetric breath-cycles with a length 8 s, and inhalation flow rates of 250 mL/s. Particles used for the model predictions had a uniform diameter of 0.84 µm and a density of 1 g/cm3.

Results: According to the theoretical data obtained from the model highest aerosol bolus dispersion may be observed in lungs affected by panacinar and bullous emphysema, whereas centriacinar and paraseptal emphysema cause a significant reduction of the phenomenon. Also other statistical parameters exhibit partly remarkable differences among the studied manifestations. Particle deposition in lungs affected by bullous emphysema falls below that of lungs impaired by the other types of emphysema by 2%-50%.

Conclusions: From the hypothetical results presented in this study it may be concluded that aerosol bolus inhalation bears a certain potential for the diagnosis of emphysematous structures and, if applied with sufficient accuracy, also for the distinction of single manifestations of emphysema. For a successful use of the technique, however, all statistical bolus parameters and particle deposition have to be subjected to a detailed evaluation.

Keywords: Aerosol bolus; dispersion; emphysema; lung; stochastic model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Main manifestations of emphysema modeled in this contribution. (A) Centriacinar emphysema; (B) paraseptal emphysema; (C) panacinar emphysema; (D) bullous emphysema.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mathematical and geometric approach to the alveolar structure of healthy subjects (A) and the different types of emphysematous modifications of the peripheral region: (B) centriacinar emphysema, (C) paraseptal emphysema, (D) panacinar and bullous emphysema (35). See text for a more detailed description.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sketch illustrating the contrast between abnormally inflated alveolar structures on the one side and collapsed air sacs on the other. All these scenarios are considered in the theoretical model by definition of a so-called degree of alveolarization (palv).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Statistical parameters obtained from the aerosol bolus dispersion model and their expression as functions of the volumetric lung depth (VLD). (A) Half-width of the exhaled bolus; (B) standard deviation; (C) skewness; (D) mode-shift.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of statistical parameters (VLD: 200, 400, and 600 mL) of aerosol bolus dispersion predicted for healthy and diseased lungs. (A) Half-width of the exhaled bolus; (B) standard deviation; (C) skewness; (D) mode-shift (**,P< 0.01).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Deposition of particles from aerosol boluses inspired by healthy subjects and emphysema patients. (A) Deposition curves as functions of VLD; (B) comparison of total deposition values predicted four three different VLDS (200, 400, and 600 mL; **, P< 0.01).

References

    1. O’Donnell MD, O’Connor CM, FitzGerald MX, et al. Ultrastructure of lung elastin and collagen in mouse models of spontanous emphysema. Matrix Biol 1999;18:357-60. 10.1016/S0945-053X(99)00031-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Waddell TK. Treatment of patients with lung cancer and severe emphysema: lessons from lung volume reduction surgery. Surg Oncol 2002;11:201-6. 10.1016/S0960-7404(02)00045-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cardoso WV, Sekhon HS, Hyde DM, et al. Collagen and elastin in human pulmonary emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;147:975-81. 10.1164/ajrccm/147.4.975 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fitzpatrick M. Studies on human pulmonary connective tissue. Am Rev Respir Dis 1967;96:254-65. - PubMed
    1. Foronjy R, D’Armiento J. The role of collagenase in emphysema. Respir Res 2001;2:348-52. 10.1186/rr85 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources