Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 26;4(1):ofw258.
doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw258. eCollection 2017 Winter.

Real-World Effectiveness of Simeprevir-containing Regimens Among Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus: The SONET Study

Affiliations

Real-World Effectiveness of Simeprevir-containing Regimens Among Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus: The SONET Study

Imtiaz Alam et al. Open Forum Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The Simeprevir ObservatioNal Effectiveness across practice seTtings (SONET) study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of simeprevir-based treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

Methods: The SONET study was a phase 4, prospective, observational, United States-based study enrolling patients ≥18 years of age with chronic genotype 1 HCV infection. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12), defined as HCV ribonucleic acid undetectable ≥12 weeks after the end of all HCV treatments.

Results: Of 315 patients (intent-to-treat [ITT] population), 275 (87.3%) completed the study. Overall, 291 were treated with simeprevir + sofosbuvir, 17 with simeprevir + sofosbuvir + ribavirin, and 7 with simeprevir + peginterferon + ribavirin. The majority of patients were male (63.2%) and white (60.6%); median age was 58 years, 71.7% had genotype/subtype 1a, and 39.4% had cirrhosis. The SVR12 was achieved by 81.2% (255 of 314) of ITT patients (analysis excluded 1 patient who completed the study but was missing SVR12 data); 2 had viral breakthrough and 18 had viral relapse. The SVR12 was achieved by 92.4% (255 of 276) of patients in the modified ITT (mITT) population, which excluded patients who discontinued treatment for nonvirologic reasons before the SVR12 time point or were missing SVR12 assessment data. Among mITT patients, higher SVR12 rates were associated with factors including age ≥65 years, non-Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, and employment status, but not genotype/subtype nor presence of cirrhosis. Simeprevir-based treatment was well tolerated; no serious adverse events were considered related to simeprevir.

Conclusions: In the real-world setting, simeprevir + sofosbuvir treatment was common and 92% of mITT patients achieved SVR12. Simeprevir-based treatment was effective and well tolerated in this cohort, including patients with cirrhosis.

Keywords: hepatitis C virus; real-world; simeprevir.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient disposition. aData for the simeprevir + peginterferon + ribavirin group are not reported due to the small sample size; however, data for these patients are included in the total population. bPatients were discontinued when the investigator decided to no longer participate in the study. cBoth deaths occurred >30 days after the last dose of study medication and were considered unrelated to simeprevir. dAdverse event (AE) was grade 3 thrombocytopenia and was considered very likely related to simeprevir and sofosbuvir. ITT, intent to treat.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Achievement of SVR12. aSustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) analysis was based on a snapshot approach. bIncludes 7 patients treated with simeprevir + peginterferon + ribavirin. cExcludes 1 patient who completed treatment and the study but was missing data for the SVR12 time point. dIncludes 6 patients treated with simeprevir + peginterferon + ribavirin. eThe modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population includes patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population excluding those who discontinued for nonvirologic reasons before the SVR12 time point, or with missing SVR12 assessment data (38 patients and 1 patient, respectively). CI, confidence interval.

References

    1. World Health Organization. Hepatitis C fact sheet number 164 Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs164/en/ Accessed 8 November 2016.
    1. AASLD IDSA IAS-USA. Recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C Available at: http://www.hcvguidelines.org Accessed 18 May 2016.
    1. European Association for Study of Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol 2014; 60:392–420. - PubMed
    1. Zoulim F, Liang TJ, Gerbes AL, et al. Hepatitis C virus treatment in the real world: optimising treatment and access to therapies. Gut 2015; 64:1824–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sulkowski MS, Vargas HE, Di Bisceglie AM, et al. Effectiveness of simeprevir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in real-world patients with HCV genotype 1 infection. Gastroenterology 2015; 150:419–429. - PMC - PubMed