Urethral strictures after bipolar transurethral resection of prostate may be linked to slow resection rate
- PMID: 28480344
- PMCID: PMC5419110
- DOI: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.3.186
Urethral strictures after bipolar transurethral resection of prostate may be linked to slow resection rate
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to determine the urethral stricture (US) rate and identify clinical and surgical risk factors associated with US occurrence after transurethral resection of the prostate using the bipolar Gyrus PlasmaKinetic Tissue Management System (PK-TURP).
Materials and methods: This was an age-matched case-control study of US occurrence after PK-TURP. Retrospective data were collected from the hospital records of patients who had a minimum of 36 months of follow-up information. Among the data collected for analysis were prostate-specific antigen level, estimated prostate weight, the amount of prostate resected, operative time, history of urinary tract infection, previous transurethral resection of the prostate, and whether the PK-TURP was combined with other endourological procedures. The resection rate was calculated from the collected data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify clinical and surgical risk factors related to US formation.
Results: A total of 373 patients underwent PK-TURP between 2003 and 2009. There were 13 cases of US (3.5%), and most of them (10 of 13, 76.9%) presented within 24 months of surgery. Most of the US cases (11 of 13, 84.6%) occurred at the bulbar urethra. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified slow resection rate as the only risk factor significantly associated with US occurrence.
Conclusions: The US rate of 3.5% after PK-TURP in this study is comparable to contemporary series. A slow resection rate seems to be related to US occurrence. This should be confirmed by further studies; meanwhile, we must be mindful of this possibility when operating with the PK-TURP system.
Keywords: Risk factors; Transurethral resection of prostate; Urethral stricture.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors have nothing to disclose.
Comment in
-
Letter to the editor: Urethral strictures after bipolar transurethral resection of prostate may be linked to slow resection rate.Investig Clin Urol. 2018 Jan;59(1):66-67. doi: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.1.66. Epub 2017 Dec 27. Investig Clin Urol. 2018. PMID: 29333518 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The authors reply: Urethral strictures after bipolar transurethral resection of prostate may be linked to slow resection rate.Investig Clin Urol. 2018 Jan;59(1):68. doi: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.1.68. Epub 2017 Dec 28. Investig Clin Urol. 2018. PMID: 29333519 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Mamoulakis C, Ubbink DT, de la Rosette JJ. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol. 2009;56:798–809. - PubMed
-
- Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)--incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol. 2006;50:969–979. - PubMed
-
- Kaplan SA. Transurethral resection of the prostate--is our gold standard still a precious commodity? J Urol. 2008;180:15–16. - PubMed
-
- Reich O, Gratzke C, Stief CG. Techniques and long-term results of surgical procedures for BPH. Eur Urol. 2006;49:970–978. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
