Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 1;123(15):2901-2908.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.30709. Epub 2017 May 8.

County-level cumulative environmental quality associated with cancer incidence

Affiliations

County-level cumulative environmental quality associated with cancer incidence

Jyotsna S Jagai et al. Cancer. .

Erratum in

  • Errata.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Cancer. 2019 May 15;125(10):1756. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31992. Epub 2019 Feb 1. Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31026077 No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: Individual environmental exposures are associated with cancer development; however, environmental exposures occur simultaneously. The Environmental Quality Index (EQI) is a county-level measure of cumulative environmental exposures that occur in 5 domains.

Methods: The EQI was linked to county-level annual age-adjusted cancer incidence rates from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program state cancer profiles. All-site cancer and the top 3 site-specific cancers for male and female subjects were considered. Incident rate differences (IRDs; annual rate difference per 100,000 persons) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using fixed-slope, random intercept multilevel linear regression models. Associations were assessed with domain-specific indices and analyses were stratified by rural/urban status.

Results: Comparing the highest quintile/poorest environmental quality with the lowest quintile/best environmental quality for overall EQI, all-site county-level cancer incidence rate was positively associated with poor environmental quality overall (IRD, 38.55; 95% CI, 29.57-47.53) and for male (IRD, 32.60; 95% CI, 16.28-48.91) and female (IRD, 30.34; 95% CI, 20.47-40.21) subjects, indicating a potential increase in cancer incidence with decreasing environmental quality. Rural/urban stratified models demonstrated positive associations comparing the highest with the lowest quintiles for all strata, except the thinly populated/rural stratum and in the metropolitan/urbanized stratum. Prostate and breast cancer demonstrated the strongest positive associations with poor environmental quality.

Conclusion: We observed strong positive associations between the EQI and all-site cancer incidence rates, and associations differed by rural/urban status and environmental domain. Research focusing on single environmental exposures in cancer development may not address the broader environmental context in which cancers develop, and future research should address cumulative environmental exposures. Cancer 2017;123:2901-8. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Keywords: air; all-site cancer; built; cumulative environmental exposures; land; sociodemographic; water.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors do not have any conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Incidence Rate Differences (95% CI) for all site cancer, 2006–2010, and overall Environmental Quality Index (EQI), combined and separately for males and females by urban/rural continuum (RUCC1, metropolitan urbanized; RUCC2, non-metro urbanized; RUCC3, less urbanized; and RUCC4, thinly populated) using quintile 1 (best environmental quality) as reference and adjusting for county percentage of population ever smoked.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Incidence Rate Differences (95% CI) for all site cancer, 2006–2010, for domain-specific indices (Air, Water, Land, Built, and Sociodemographic (SD) domains) by urban/rural continuum (RUCC1, metropolitan urbanized; RUCC2, non-metro urbanized; RUCC3, less urbanized; and RUCC4, thinly populated) using quintile 1 (best environmental domain quality) as reference and adjusting for county percentage of population ever smoked and all other environmental domain indices.

Comment in

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan;63(1):11–30. - PubMed
    1. National Heart L, and Blood Institute. Fact book: fiscal year 2008. National Institues of Health; 2009.
    1. Tomasetti C, Vogelstein B. Cancer etiology. Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions. Science. 2015 Jan 2;347(6217):78–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wallace TA, Martin DN, Ambs S. Interactions among genes, tumor biology and the environment in cancer health disparities: examining the evidence on a national and global scale. Carcinogenesis. 2011 Aug;32(8):1107–1121. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu S, Powers S, Zhu W, Hannun YA. Substantial contribution of extrinsic risk factors to cancer development. Nature. 2016 Jan 7;529(7584):43–47. - PMC - PubMed