Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;8(3):475-487.
doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0265-4. Epub 2017 May 8.

A Practical Review of C-Peptide Testing in Diabetes

Affiliations
Review

A Practical Review of C-Peptide Testing in Diabetes

Emma Leighton et al. Diabetes Ther. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

C-peptide is a widely used measure of pancreatic beta cell function. It is produced in equimolar amounts to endogenous insulin but is excreted at a more constant rate over a longer time. Methods of estimation include urinary and unstimulated and stimulated serum sampling. Modern assays detect levels of c-peptide which can be used to guide diabetes diagnosis and management. We explore the evidence behind the various tests available. We recommend the glucagon stimulation c-peptide testing owing to its balance of sensitivity and practicality. C-peptide levels are associated with diabetes type and duration of disease. Specifically a c-peptide level of less than 0.2 nmol/l is associated with a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). C-peptide level may correlate with microvascular and macrovascular complications and future use of insulin therapy, as well as likely response to other individual therapies. We explore the potential uses of c-peptide measurement in clinical practice.

Keywords: C-peptide; Diabetes; Insulin; Type 1 diabetes; Type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Glucagon-stimulated c-peptide test (GST)

References

    1. Jones AG, Hattersley AT. The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30:803–817. doi: 10.1111/dme.12159. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kulkarni CM, Patil S. Urinary C-peptide and urine C-peptide/creatinine ratio (UCPCR) are possible predictors of endogenous insulin secretion in T2DM subjects—a randomized study. Int J Pharma Bio Sci. 2016;7:443–446.
    1. Steiner DF, Cunningham D, Spigelman L, Aten B. Insulin biosynthesis: evidence for a precursor. Science. 1967;157:697–700. doi: 10.1126/science.157.3789.697. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yosten GLC, Maric-Bilkan C, Luppi P, Wahren J. Physiological effects and therapeutic potential of proinsulin C-peptide. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;307:E955–E968. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00130.2014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McDonald TJ, Knight BA, Shields BM, Bowman P, Salzmann MB, Hattersley AT. Stability and reproducibility of a single-sample urinary C-peptide/creatinine ratio and its correlation with 24-h urinary C-peptide. Clin Chem. 2009;55:2035–2039. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.129312. - DOI - PubMed