Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 1;19(6):677-685.
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw204.

Does Tobacco Abstinence Decrease Reward Sensitivity? A Human Laboratory Test

Affiliations

Does Tobacco Abstinence Decrease Reward Sensitivity? A Human Laboratory Test

John R Hughes et al. Nicotine Tob Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: Animal studies report abstinence from nicotine makes rewards less rewarding; however, the results of human tests of the effects of cessation on reward sensitivity are mixed. The current study tested reward sensitivity in abstinent smokers using more rigorous methods than most prior studies.

Methods: A human laboratory study compared outcomes for 1 week prior to quitting to those during 4 weeks postquit. The study used smokers trying to quit, objective and subjective measures, multiple measures during smoking and abstinence, and monetary rewards to increase the prevalence of abstinence. Current daily smokers (n = 211) who were trying to quit completed an operant measure of reward sensitivity and a survey of pleasure from various rewards as well as self-reports of anhedonia, delay discounting, positive affect, and tobacco withdrawal twice each week. A comparison group of long-term former smokers (n = 67) also completed the tasks weekly for 4 weeks. Primary analyses were based on the 61 current smokers who abstained for all 4 weeks.

Results: Stopping smoking decreased self-reported pleasure from rewards but did not decrease reward sensitivity on the operant task. Abstinence also decreased self-reported reward frequency and increased the two anhedonia measures. However, the changes with abstinence were small for all outcomes (6%-14%) and most lasted less than a week.

Conclusions: Abstinence from tobacco decreased most self-report measures of reward sensitivity; however, it did not change the objective measure. The self-report effects were small.

Implications: Animal research suggests that nicotine withdrawal decreases reward sensitivity. Replication tests of this in humans have produced inconsistent results. We report what we believe is a more rigorous test. We found smoking abstinence slightly decreases self-reports of reward sensitivity but does not do so for a behavioral measure of reward sensitivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Participant flowchart: All percentages are of the number in box above.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Time course for selected outcomes. Solid line = current smokers. Dotted line = former smokers. AES = Apathy Evaluation Scale; MNWS = Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale; TEPS = Temporal Evaluation of Pleasure Scale.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Time course for selected outcomes. Solid line = current smokers. Dotted line = former smokers. PANAS = Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale; REI = Rewarding Events Inventory.

References

    1. Dagher A, Bleicher C, Aston JA, Gunn RN, Clarke PB, Cumming P. Reduced dopamine D1 receptor binding in the ventral striatum of cigarette smokers. Synapse. 2001;42(1):48–53. - PubMed
    1. Epping-Jordan M, Watkins S, Koob G, Markou A. Dramatic decreases in brain reward function during nicotine withdrawal. Nature. 1998;393(6680):76–79. - PubMed
    1. Melis M, Spiga S, Diana M. The dopamine hypothesis of drug addiction: hypodopaminergic state. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2005;63:101–154. - PubMed
    1. Koob GF, Le Moal M. Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;24(2):97–129. - PubMed
    1. Pergadia ML, Der-Avakian A, D’Souza MS, et al. Association between nicotine withdrawal and reward responsiveness in humans and rats. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(11):1238–1245. - PMC - PubMed