Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 10;17(1):423.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4320-x.

The comprehensive 'Communicate to Vaccinate' taxonomy of communication interventions for childhood vaccination in routine and campaign contexts

Jessica Kaufman  1 , Heather Ames  2 , Xavier Bosch-Capblanch  3   4 , Yuri Cartier  5 , Julie Cliff  6 , Claire Glenton  2 , Simon Lewin  2   7 , Artur Manuel Muloliwa  8 , Afiong Oku  9 , Angela Oyo-Ita  9 , Gabriel Rada  10 , Sophie Hill  11
Affiliations

The comprehensive 'Communicate to Vaccinate' taxonomy of communication interventions for childhood vaccination in routine and campaign contexts

Jessica Kaufman et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Communication can be used to generate demand for vaccination or address vaccine hesitancy, and is crucial to successful childhood vaccination programmes. Research efforts have primarily focused on communication for routine vaccination. However, vaccination campaigns, particularly in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs), also use communication in diverse ways. Without a comprehensive framework integrating communication interventions from routine and campaign contexts, it is not possible to conceptualise the full range of possible vaccination communication interventions. Therefore, vaccine programme managers may be unaware of potential communication options and researchers may not focus on building evidence for interventions used in practice. In this paper, we broaden the scope of our existing taxonomy of communication interventions for routine vaccination to include communication used in campaigns, and integrate these into a comprehensive taxonomy of vaccination communication interventions.

Methods: Building on our taxonomy of communication for routine vaccination, we identified communication interventions used in vaccination campaigns through a targeted literature search; observation of vaccination activities in Cameroon, Mozambique and Nigeria; and stakeholder consultations. We added these interventions to descriptions of routine vaccination communication and categorised the interventions according to their intended purposes, building from an earlier taxonomy of communication related to routine vaccination.

Results: The comprehensive taxonomy groups communication used in campaigns and routine childhood vaccination into seven purpose categories: 'Inform or Educate'; 'Remind or Recall'; 'Enhance Community Ownership'; 'Teach Skills'; 'Provide Support'; 'Facilitate Decision Making' and 'Enable Communication'. Consultations with LMIC stakeholders and experts informed the taxonomy's definitions and structure and established its potential uses.

Conclusions: This taxonomy provides a standardised way to think and speak about vaccination communication. It is categorised by purpose to help conceptualise communication interventions as potential solutions to address needs or problems. It can be utilised by programme planners, implementers, researchers and funders to see the range of communication interventions used in practice, facilitate evidence synthesis and identify evidence gaps.

Keywords: Campaigns; Childhood vaccination; Communication; Immunisation; Interventions; Taxonomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The COMMVAC routine vaccination communication taxonomy purposes
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The multi-directional nature of vaccination communication: examples of the actors and channels involved
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Communication on immunisation – Building trust. Stockholm: ECDC; 2012. http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/TER-Immunisation-and-.... Accessed 19 July 2016.
    1. Hajjeh R. Accelerating introduction of new vaccines: barriers to introduction and lessons learned from the recent Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine experience. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2011;366:2827–2832. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0046. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maternal Child Health Integrated Program (MCHIP). Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs: Lessons Learned from New Vaccine Introductions in Low-resource Countries, 2008 to 2013: USAID; 2013. http://www.jsi.com/JSIInternet/Inc/Common/_download_pub.cfm?id=15580&lid=3. Accessed 21 July 2016.
    1. Waisbord S, Shimp L, Ogden EW, Morry C. Communication for polio eradication: improving the quality of communication programming through real-time monitoring and evaluation. J Health Commun. 2010;15(Suppl 1):9–24. doi: 10.1080/10810731003695375. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Willis N, Hill S, Kaufman J, Lewin S, Kis-Rigo J, De Castro Freire SB, et al. "Communicate to vaccinate": the development of a taxonomy of communication interventions to improve routine childhood vaccination. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013;13:23. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-13-23. - DOI - PMC - PubMed