Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;22(8):934-943.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0462. Epub 2017 May 9.

Geriatric Assessment Predicts Survival and Competing Mortality in Elderly Patients with Early Colorectal Cancer: Can It Help in Adjuvant Therapy Decision-Making?

Affiliations

Geriatric Assessment Predicts Survival and Competing Mortality in Elderly Patients with Early Colorectal Cancer: Can It Help in Adjuvant Therapy Decision-Making?

Maite Antonio et al. Oncologist. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The challenge when selecting elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) for adjuvant therapy is to estimate the likelihood that death from other causes will preclude cancer events from occurring. The aim of this paper is to evaluate whether comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can predict survival and cancer-specific mortality in elderly CRC patients candidates for adjuvant therapy.

Material and methods: One hundred ninety-five consecutive patients aged ≥75 with high-risk stage II and stage III CRC were prospectively included from May 2008 to May 2015. All patients underwent CGA, which evaluated comorbidity, polypharmacy, functional status, geriatric syndromes, mood, cognition, and social support. According to CGA results, patients were classified into three groups-fit, medium-fit, and unfit-to receive standard therapy, adjusted treatment, and best supportive care, respectively. We recorded survival and cause of death and used the Fine-Gray regression model to analyze competing causes of death.

Results: Following CGA, 85 (43%) participants were classified as fit, 57 (29%) as medium-fit, and 53 (28%) as unfit. The univariate 5-year survival rates were 74%, 52%, and 27%. Sixty-one (31%) patients died due to cancer progression (53%), non-cancer-related cause (46%), and unknown reasons (1%); there were no toxicity-related deaths. Fit and medium-fit participants were more likely to die due to cancer progression, whereas patients classified as unfit were at significantly greater risk of non-cancer-related death.

Conclusion: CGA showed efficacy in predicting survival and discriminating between causes of death in elderly patients with high-risk stage II and stage III resected CRC, with potential implications for shaping the decision-making process for adjuvant therapies.

Implications for practice: Adjuvant therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer is controversial due to the high risk for competing events among these patients. In order to effectively select older patients for adjuvant therapy, we have to weigh the risk of cancer-related mortality and the potential survival benefits with treatment against the patient's life expectancy, irrespective of cancer. This prospective study focused on the prognostic value of geriatric assessment for survival using a competing-risk analysis approach, providing an important contribution on the treatment decision-making process and helping clinicians to identify elderly patients who might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy among those who will not.

Keywords: Adjuvant therapy; Colorectal cancer; Competing risk model; Comprehensive geriatric assessment; Decision‐making; Elderly.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan‐Meier curves of five‐year overall survival in total sample (n = 195) of patients with colorectal cancer by oncogeriatric categories: fit (n = 85), medium‐fit (n = 57) and unfit (n = 53).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cumulative incidence function of cause of death for all patients and by oncogeriatric category.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Adjusted subdistribution function of cancer‐related mortality (A) and non‐cancer‐related mortality (B) by oncogeriatric category. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval.

References

    1. Shih YC, Hurria A. Preparing for an epidemic: Cancer care in an aging population. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2014:133–137. - PubMed
    1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z et al. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64:9–29. - PubMed
    1. National Cancer Institute: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program: SEER Fact Sheets‐Colon and rectum Cancer. Available at https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html. Accessed April 4, 2017.
    1. Brenner H, Bouvier AM, Foschi R et al. Progress in colorectal cancer survival in Europe from the late 1980s to the early 21st century: The EUROCARE study. Int J Cancer 2012;131:1649–1658. - PubMed
    1. Holleczek B, Rossi S, Domenic A et al. On‐going improvement and persistent differences in the survival for patients with colon and rectum cancer across Europe 1999–2007—Results from the EUROCARE‐5 study. Eur J Cancer 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. - PubMed

Publication types