Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017:2017:3595461.
doi: 10.1155/2017/3595461. Epub 2017 Apr 11.

Effect of Drop Foot on Spatiotemporal, Kinematic, and Kinetic Parameters during Gait

Affiliations

Effect of Drop Foot on Spatiotemporal, Kinematic, and Kinetic Parameters during Gait

Ida Wiszomirska et al. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2017.

Abstract

Background. The complexity of the structure and function of a living body can be affected by disorders and can cause various dysfunctions. Objective. The aim of this study was to determine compensatory mechanisms in subjects with drop foot during gait. Methods. The study evaluated 10 subjects with drop foot (DF) whose results were compared to a group of 10 healthy controls (C). Spatiotemporal, kinematic, and kinetic parameters during the gait cycle were collected using Vicon system synchronized with Kistler platforms. Results. Spatiotemporal, kinematic, and kinetic parameters were significantly different between the analysed groups. In the DF group, the subjects walked almost 47% slower and performed 60% less steps per minute compared to the C group. The main problem in the DF group was insufficient ankle dorsiflexion in the 0-10% of the gait cycle. Mean values in the groups during the first 10% of the gait cycle were as follows: DF (-10.42 ± 5.7°) and C (-2.37 ± 1.47°), which affected the substantial differences in the values of muscle torque: DF (0.2 ± 0.1 Nm/kg) and C (-0.26 ± 0.06 Nm/kg). Conclusions. Comparative analysis for joint angles and torques demonstrated that the mechanism of compensation is the most noticeable in the knee joint and less in the hip joint.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean profiles of angles and muscle torques in the gait cycle for the group of people with symptoms of drop foot (DF) and healthy controls (C); (a) angle in the ankle, (c) knee, (e) hip; (b) muscle torque in the ankle, (d) knee, (f) hip.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean values and standard deviations for the coefficient of differences between extreme points for (a) angle and (b) torque in the stance and swing phases in joints of the lower limb during gait cycle.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Perry J. S. Incorporated. Normal and Pathological Function. Thorofare, NJ, USA: SLACK Incorporated; 1992. Gait analysis. - DOI
    1. Wagenaar F. C., Louwerens J. W. Posterior tibial tendon transfer: results of fixation to the dorsiflexors proximal to the ankle joint. Foot & Ankle International. 2007;28(11):1128–1142. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.1128. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim H., Kwak K., Kim D. The effect of mechanical vibration stimulation of perception subthreshold on the muscle force and muscle reaction time of lower leg. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics. 2016;2016:p. 7. doi: 10.1155/2016/8794363.8794363 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sheffler L. R., Hennessey M. T., Naples G. G., Chae J. Peroneal nerve stimulation versus an ankle foot orthosis for correction of foot drop in stroke: impact on functional ambulation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2006;20(3):355–360. doi: 10.1177/1545968306287925. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simonsen E. B., Moesby L. M., Hansen L. D., Comins J., Alkjaer T. Redistribution of joint moments during walking in patients with drop-foot. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 2010;25(9):949–952. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.06.013. - DOI - PubMed