Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017:2017:8520480.
doi: 10.1155/2017/8520480. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

Node-Structured Integrative Gaussian Graphical Model Guided by Pathway Information

Affiliations

Node-Structured Integrative Gaussian Graphical Model Guided by Pathway Information

SungHwan Kim et al. Comput Math Methods Med. 2017.

Abstract

Up to date, many biological pathways related to cancer have been extensively applied thanks to outputs of burgeoning biomedical research. This leads to a new technical challenge of exploring and validating biological pathways that can characterize transcriptomic mechanisms across different disease subtypes. In pursuit of accommodating multiple studies, the joint Gaussian graphical model was previously proposed to incorporate nonzero edge effects. However, this model is inevitably dependent on post hoc analysis in order to confirm biological significance. To circumvent this drawback, we attempt not only to combine transcriptomic data but also to embed pathway information, well-ascertained biological evidence as such, into the model. To this end, we propose a novel statistical framework for fitting joint Gaussian graphical model simultaneously with informative pathways consistently expressed across multiple studies. In theory, structured nodes can be prespecified with multiple genes. The optimization rule employs the structured input-output lasso model, in order to estimate a sparse precision matrix constructed by simultaneous effects of multiple studies and structured nodes. With an application to breast cancer data sets, we found that the proposed model is superior in efficiently capturing structures of biological evidence (e.g., pathways). An R software package nsiGGM is publicly available at author's webpage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Three gene networks estimated by the nsiGGM. The detection rate of pathway genes is 0.573.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Three gene networks estimated by the JGGM. The detection rate of pathway genes is 0.521.
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 1
The structured alternating directions method of multipliers algorithm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Maglietta R., Distaso A., Piepoli A., et al. On the reproducibility of results of pathway analysis in genome-wide expression studies of colorectal cancers. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2010;43(3):397–406. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.09.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Viswanathan G. A., Seto J., Patil S., Nudelman G., Sealfon S. C. Getting started in biological pathway construction and analysis. PLoS Computational Biology. 2008;4(2, article e16) doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0040016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bild A. H., Yao G., Chang J. T., et al. Oncogenic pathway signatures in human cancers as a guide to targeted therapies. Nature. 2006;439(7074):353–357. doi: 10.1038/nature04296. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D., Weinberg R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kessler T., Hache H., Wierling C. Integrative analysis of cancer-related signaling pathways. Frontiers in Physiology. 2013;4, article 124 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00124. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources