Revisiting Femoral vs. Radial access-do vascular closure devices level the playing field?
- PMID: 28488412
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27078
Revisiting Femoral vs. Radial access-do vascular closure devices level the playing field?
Abstract
Previous large randomized multicenter trials have shown superiority of radial to femoral access in reducing major bleeding, vascular complications, and in some cohorts, mortality Vascular closure devices improve time to hemostasis and ambulation, as well as patient comfort, but have not been shown to reduce major complications or mortality consistently in the high level evidence base. The combination of optimal femoral access and closure with a vascular closure device has the potential to narrow the gap between the radial and femoral approaches in high risk patients, but unfortunately this study was too limited to confirm either non-inferiority or equivalence.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment on
-
Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;89(6):976-982. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26689. Epub 2016 Aug 12. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 27514319 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous