Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;111(2):557-579.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2316-z. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics' OA practice

Affiliations

Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics' OA practice

Yimei Zhu. Scientometrics. 2017.

Abstract

This paper presents the findings from a survey study of UK academics and their publishing behaviour. The aim of this study is to investigate academics' attitudes towards and practice of open access (OA) publishing. The results are based on a survey study of academics at 12 Russell Group universities, and reflect responses from over 1800 researchers. This study found that whilst most academics support the principle of making knowledge freely available to everyone, the use of OA publishing among UK academics was still limited despite relevant established OA policies. The results suggest that there were differences in the extent of OA practice between different universities, academic disciplines, age and seniorities. Academics' use in OA publishing was also related to their awareness of OA policy and OA repositories, their attitudes towards the importance of OA publishing and their belief in OA citation advantage. The implications of these findings are relevant to the development of strategies for the implementation of OA policies.

Keywords: Academic publishing; Gold OA; Green OA; Open access; Open science; Scholarly communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barnes S, Lewin C. An introduction to inferential statistics: Testing for differences and relationships. In: Somekh B, Lewin C, editors. Research methods in the social sciences. London: Sage; 2005. pp. 226–235.
    1. Björk BC. Open access to scientific publications—An analysis of the barriers to change? Information Research. 2004;9(2):170.
    1. Björk BC, Welling P, Laakso M, Majlender P, Hedlund T, Guonason G. Open Access to the scientific journal literature: Situation 2009. PLoS ONE. 2010 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bohannon J. Who’s afraid of peer review? Science. 2013;342(6154):60–65. doi: 10.1126/science.342.6154.60. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Børing, P., Flanagan, K., Kaloudis, A., & Karakasidou, A. (2010). Mobility survey of the higher education sector. Report. Retrieved 5 January, 2015, from https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:158492/

LinkOut - more resources