Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics' OA practice
- PMID: 28490821
- PMCID: PMC5400788
- DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2316-z
Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics' OA practice
Abstract
This paper presents the findings from a survey study of UK academics and their publishing behaviour. The aim of this study is to investigate academics' attitudes towards and practice of open access (OA) publishing. The results are based on a survey study of academics at 12 Russell Group universities, and reflect responses from over 1800 researchers. This study found that whilst most academics support the principle of making knowledge freely available to everyone, the use of OA publishing among UK academics was still limited despite relevant established OA policies. The results suggest that there were differences in the extent of OA practice between different universities, academic disciplines, age and seniorities. Academics' use in OA publishing was also related to their awareness of OA policy and OA repositories, their attitudes towards the importance of OA publishing and their belief in OA citation advantage. The implications of these findings are relevant to the development of strategies for the implementation of OA policies.
Keywords: Academic publishing; Gold OA; Green OA; Open access; Open science; Scholarly communication.
Similar articles
-
Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review.F1000Res. 2018 Dec 11;7:1925. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17328.2. eCollection 2018. F1000Res. 2018. PMID: 32399178 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Open Access Publishing in India: Coverage, Relevance, and Future Perspectives.J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Jul 15;34(27):e180. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e180. J Korean Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 31293108 Free PMC article.
-
Open access: academic publishing and its implications for knowledge equity in Kenya.Global Health. 2014 Apr 9;10:26. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-10-26. Global Health. 2014. PMID: 24716579 Free PMC article.
-
Open access behaviours and perceptions of health sciences faculty and roles of information professionals.Health Info Libr J. 2015 Mar;32(1):37-49. doi: 10.1111/hir.12094. Epub 2015 Jan 21. Health Info Libr J. 2015. PMID: 25603838
-
Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries.J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Jul;94(3):253-62. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006. PMID: 16888657 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Mind the gender gap: COVID-19 lockdown effects on gender differences in preprint submissions.PLoS One. 2022 Mar 25;17(3):e0264265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264265. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35333874 Free PMC article.
-
Beliefs about social dynamics and open science.R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 21;12(5):230061. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230061. eCollection 2025 May. R Soc Open Sci. 2025. PMID: 40406188 Free PMC article.
-
Choices of immediate open access and the relationship to journal ranking and publish-and-read deals.Front Res Metr Anal. 2022 Oct 20;7:943932. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.943932. eCollection 2022. Front Res Metr Anal. 2022. PMID: 36339745 Free PMC article.
-
Open Science Practices in Communication Sciences and Disorders: A Survey.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Jun 20;66(6):1928-1947. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00062. Epub 2022 Nov 23. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023. PMID: 36417765 Free PMC article.
-
Female Dynamics in Authorship of Scientific Publications in the Public Library of Science: A 10-year Bibliometric Analysis of Biomedical Research.Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Jan 20;13(2):228-237. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13020018. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023. PMID: 36826202 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barnes S, Lewin C. An introduction to inferential statistics: Testing for differences and relationships. In: Somekh B, Lewin C, editors. Research methods in the social sciences. London: Sage; 2005. pp. 226–235.
-
- Björk BC. Open access to scientific publications—An analysis of the barriers to change? Information Research. 2004;9(2):170.
-
- Børing, P., Flanagan, K., Kaloudis, A., & Karakasidou, A. (2010). Mobility survey of the higher education sector. Report. Retrieved 5 January, 2015, from https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:158492/
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources