Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 27:9:245-250.
doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S129779. eCollection 2017.

Clinical epidemiology in the era of big data: new opportunities, familiar challenges

Affiliations

Clinical epidemiology in the era of big data: new opportunities, familiar challenges

Vera Ehrenstein et al. Clin Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Routinely recorded health data have evolved from mere by-products of health care delivery or billing into a powerful research tool for studying and improving patient care through clinical epidemiologic research. Big data in the context of epidemiologic research means large interlinkable data sets within a single country or networks of multinational databases. Several Nordic, European, and other multinational collaborations are now well established. Advantages of big data for clinical epidemiology include improved precision of estimates, which is especially important for reassuring ("null") findings; ability to conduct meaningful analyses in subgroup of patients; and rapid detection of safety signals. Big data will also provide new possibilities for research by enabling access to linked information from biobanks, electronic medical records, patient-reported outcome measures, automatic and semiautomatic electronic monitoring devices, and social media. The sheer amount of data, however, does not eliminate and may even amplify systematic error. Therefore, methodologies addressing systematic error, clinical knowledge, and underlying hypotheses are more important than ever to ensure that the signal is discernable behind the noise.

Keywords: electronic health records; healthcare administrative claims; medical record linkage; multicenter studies; validation studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Building that used to house the Norwegian Leprosy Registry, currently home of the Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway. Note: Courtesy: Dr Astrid Lunde.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. de la Torre Díez I, Cosgaya HM, Garcia-Zapirain B, López-Coronado M. Big Data in health: a literature review from the year 2005. J Med Syst. 2016;40(9):209. - PubMed
    1. Andreu-Perez J, Poon CC, Merrifield RD, Wong ST, Yang GZ. Big data for health. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2015;19(4):1193–1208. - PubMed
    1. Psaty BM, Breckenridge AM. Mini-Sentinel and regulatory science–big data rendered fit and functional. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(23):2165–2167. - PubMed
    1. Murdoch TB, Detsky AS. The inevitable application of big data to health care. JAMA. 2013;309(13):1351–1352. - PubMed
    1. Trifirò G, Coloma PM, Rijnbeek PR, et al. Combining multiple healthcare databases for postmarketing drug and vaccine safety surveillance: why and how? J Intern Med. 2014;275(6):551–561. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources