Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 2;1(1):13-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2014.12.002. eCollection 2015 Feb.

Clinical and bacteriological efficacy of twice daily topical retapamulin ointment 1% in the management of impetigo and other uncomplicated superficial skin infections

Affiliations

Clinical and bacteriological efficacy of twice daily topical retapamulin ointment 1% in the management of impetigo and other uncomplicated superficial skin infections

Benjamin R Bohaty et al. Int J Womens Dermatol. .

Abstract

Background: Cutaneous bacterial infections are common in children and adults and frequently are caused by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). Treatment failures with topical agents are not uncommon and have been shown to be secondary to bacterial resistance.

Objective: To determine clinical and bacteriological efficacy of retapamulin ointment 1% in treatment of patients with cutaneous bacterial infections caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and other bacteria.

Methods: Prospective, nonrandomized, uncontrolled, open label, single center trial conducted between April 2008 and November 2012 that evaluated efficacy of retapamulin ointment 1% in the treatment of impetigo, folliculitis, and other minor soft tissue infections in children and adults. Fifty patients, who presented to a dermatology outpatient clinic and were clinically diagnosed with impetigo, folliculitis, or minor soft tissue infection suitable for treatment with a topical antibiotic, were screened. Thirty-eight patients were enrolled and received treatment: topical retapamulin ointment 1% twice daily for 5 days. Seven patients were MRSA positive and qualified for the primary efficacy population. One patient withdrew due to an adverse event. Clinical and microbiological exams were performed at baseline and follow-up 5 to 7 days later to assess clinical, microbiological, and therapeutic responses. Primary outcome was clinical response at follow-up in primary efficacy population with MRSA isolated as the baseline pathogen. Secondary outcomes included clinical, microbiologic, and therapeutic responses in patients who were culture positive for any species of bacteria.

Results: Clinical response at follow-up in the primary efficacy population (MRSA-positive patients) was not sufficiently powered to demonstrate significance; however, outcomes were excellent, with 7 of 7 patients demonstrating clinical success (5 of 7) or clinical improvement (2 of 7) at follow-up. Barring lack of significance due to small total sample size for patients who were culture positive for any species of bacteria (n = 35), overall success rates were favorable for clinical, microbiologic, and therapeutic responses with values of 66%, 97%, and 69%, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity. No serious AEs were reported.

Conclusion: Safety profile appears favorable given the low number of AEs. Study design limits conclusions that can be drawn. Nevertheless, this study supports use of topical retapamulin 1% ointment in treatment of cutaneous bacterial infections, particularly those caused by S. aureus, including MRSA.

Keywords: Impetigo; MRSA; MSSA; Pediatric; Retapamulin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of patient progress throughout the trial: CLI = all patients enrolled in the study who received at least 1 application of study medication, MIC = all patients in CLI who had a pathogen isolated from the treatment area at baseline upon microbiologic testing, and RES = all patients in CLI who had MRSA isolated as a baseline pathogen (primary efficacy population).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bangert S., Levy M., Hebert A.A. Bacterial resistance and impetigo treatment trends: a review. Pediatr Dermatol. 2012;29:243–248. - PubMed
    1. Bernard P. Management of common bacterial infections of the skin. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008;21:122–128. - PubMed
    1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute . Seventeenth Informational Supplement. CLSI; Wayne, PA: 2007. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. (CLSI Document M100-S17)
    1. Cole C., Gazewood J. Diagnosis and treatment of impetigo. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75:859–864. - PubMed
    1. Darmstadt G.L., Lane A.T. Impetigo: an overview. Pediatr Dermatol. 1994;11:293–303. - PubMed