Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Feb 16;3(1 Suppl):S62-S66.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.02.013. eCollection 2017 Mar.

Classifying discoid lupus erythematosus: background, gaps, and difficulties

Jessica S Haber  1   2 , Joseph F Merola  3 , Victoria P Werth  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Classifying discoid lupus erythematosus: background, gaps, and difficulties

Jessica S Haber et al. Int J Womens Dermatol. .

Abstract

To inform our ongoing efforts to develop defining features to be incorporated into a novel set of classification criteria for discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), we conducted a literature review using the Ovid MEDLINE database. A search was performed to identify studies reporting criteria used to distinguish DLE from other cutaneous lupus erythematosus subtypes. We examined which clinical, histopathologic, and serologic features have data to support their use as effective features in distinguishing DLE from other potential disease mimickers and cutaneous lupus subsets. Through our search, we were also able to identify gaps that exist in the literature which can inform future directions for research endeavors. We found that localization of lesions, characteristic features of damage, and the absence of high titer Ro/SSA antibody seem most effective in differentiating DLE from other cutaneous lupus erythematosus subtypes. Histopathologic features and class of immunoreactant deposition appear to be less helpful.

Keywords: classification; criteria; cutaneous lupus erythematosus; definition; diagnosis; discoid lupus erythematosus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Al-Refu K., Goodfield M. Immunohistochemistry of ultrastructural changes in scarring lupus erythematosus. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2010;36:63–68. - PubMed
    1. Bangert J.L., Freeman R.G., Sontheimer R.D., Gilliam J.N. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and discoid lupus erythematosus. Comparative histologic findings. Arch. Dermatol. 1984;120:332–337. - PubMed
    1. Beutner E.H., Blaszczyk M., Jablonska S., Chorzelski T.P., Kumar V., Wolska H. Studies on criteria of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venerology for the classification of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. I. Selection of clinical groups and study factors. Int. J. Dermatol. 1991;30(6):411–417. - PubMed
    1. Beutner E.H., Blaszczyk M., Jablonska S., Chorzelski T.P., White D., Wolska H. Preliminary, dermatologic first step criteria for lupus erythematosus and second step criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Int. J. Dermatol. 1993;32:645–651. - PubMed
    1. Bonilla-Martinez Z.L., Albrecht J., Troxel A.B., Taylor L., Okawa J., Dulay S. The cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease area and severity index: a responsive instrument to measure activity and damage in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Arch. Dermatol. 2008;144(2):173–180. - PMC - PubMed