Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;72(4):244-253.
doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(04)09.

Breast cancer screening in developing countries

Affiliations

Breast cancer screening in developing countries

René Aloísio da Costa Vieira et al. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Developing countries have limited healthcare resources and use different strategies to diagnose breast cancer. Most of the population depends on the public healthcare system, which affects the diagnosis of the tumor. Thus, the indicators observed in developed countries cannot be directly compared with those observed in developing countries because the healthcare infrastructures in developing countries are deficient. The aim of this study was to evaluate breast cancer screening strategies and indicators in developing countries. A systematic review and the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Timing, and Setting methodology were performed to identify possible indicators of presentation at diagnosis and the methodologies used in developing countries. We searched PubMed for the terms "Breast Cancer" or "Breast Cancer Screening" and "Developing Country" or "Developing Countries". In all, 1,149 articles were identified. Of these articles, 45 full articles were selected, which allowed us to identify indicators related to epidemiology, diagnostic intervention (diagnostic strategy, diagnostic infrastructure, percentage of women undergoing mammography), quality of intervention (presentation of symptoms at diagnosis, time to diagnosis, early stage disease), comparisons (trend curves, subpopulations at risk) and survival among different countries. The identification of these indicators will improve the reporting of methodologies used in developing countries and will allow us to evaluate improvements in public health related to breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA records flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plot comparing the Human Development Index and the percentage of clinical stage I cases selected by country. PA = Porto Alegre; SA = Saudi Arabia; SP = São Paulo.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Survival according to the SEER study (blue) and a Brazilian Oncologic Hospital (HCB, green). (a) Overall survival (OS); (b) cancer-specific survival (SS); (c) overall survival selected by clinical stage (CS) at diagnosis. Unpublished Figure (ref 62) authorized by the Authors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65((2)):87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66((1)):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chatenoud L, Bertuccio P, Bosetti C, Levi F, Curado MP, Malvezzi M, et al. Trends in cancer mortality in Brazil, 1980-2004. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010;19((2)):79–86. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32833233be. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson BO, Shyyan R, Eniu A, Smith RA, Yip CH, Bese NS, et al. Breast cancer in limited-resource countries: an overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative 2005 guidelines. Breast J. 2006;12(Suppl 1):S3–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00199.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, Singh GK, Cardinez C, Ghafoor A, et al. Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54((2)):78–93. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.54.2.78. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms