Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 13;26(2):119-128.
doi: 10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0066.

Changes in Psychosocial Measures After a 6-Week Field Trial

Jamie L Desjardins  1 , Karen A Doherty  2
Affiliations

Changes in Psychosocial Measures After a 6-Week Field Trial

Jamie L Desjardins et al. Am J Audiol. .

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the extent to which intervention with hearing aids, namely, a 6-week hearing aid field trial, can minimize the psychosocial consequences of hearing loss in adults who have previously not sought treatment for their hearing loss.

Method: Twenty-four adults with mild to moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, who had never worn hearing aids or sought help for their hearing loss, participated in this study. Participants were fitted with receiver-in-canal hearing aids, bilaterally, and wore them for 6 weeks. Participants completed subjective measures of hearing handicap and attitudes about hearing loss and hearing aids before, during, and after the hearing aid trial. A control group of age-matched participants followed the same experimental protocol, except they were not fitted with hearing aids.

Results: Using hearing aids for 6 weeks significantly reduced participants' perceived stigma of hearing aids, personal distress and inadequacy due to hearing difficulties, and hearing handicap.

Conclusions: A hearing aid trial can have a positive effect on a person's attitudes toward wearing hearing aids and decrease hearing handicap.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean pure-tone thresholds (in dB HL) averaged across the right and left ears for experimental and control group participants. Error bars represent ±1 SD.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean Hearing Handicap Questionnaire (HHQ) scores for the experimental and control group participants obtained during session 1 and session 4. Error bars represent ±1 SD.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abrams H. B., Hnath-Chisolm T., Guerreiro S. M., & Ritterman S. I. (1992). The effects of intervention strategy on self-perception of hearing handicap. Ear and Hearing, 13(5), 371–377. - PubMed
    1. Allen N. H., Burns A., Newton V., Hickson F., Ramsden R., Rogers J., … Morris J. (2003). The effects of improving hearing in dementia. Age and Ageing, 32(2), 189–193. - PubMed
    1. American National Standards Institute. (2004). Methods for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry (ANSI S3.6-2004). New York, NY: Acoustical Society of America.
    1. Arlinger S. (2003). Negative consequences of uncorrected hearing loss—A review. International Journal of Audiology, 42, 2S17–2S20. - PubMed
    1. Bilger R. C., Nuetzel J. M., Rabinowitz W. M., & Rzeczkowski C. (1984). Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 27(1), 32–48. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources