Baseline Factors Associated With 6-Month Visual Acuity and Retinal Thickness Outcomes in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion: SCORE2 Study Report 4
- PMID: 28492860
- PMCID: PMC5710260
- DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1141
Baseline Factors Associated With 6-Month Visual Acuity and Retinal Thickness Outcomes in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion: SCORE2 Study Report 4
Abstract
Importance: Macular edema (ME) is the leading cause of decreased visual acuity (VA) associated with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Identifying factors associated with better outcomes in RVO eyes treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy may provide information useful in counseling patients.
Objective: To investigate baseline characteristics associated with 6-month VA and central subfield thickness (CST) outcomes in participants in the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2).
Design, setting, and participants: A total of 362 patients with central RVO or hemi-RVO were enrolled between September 17, 2014, and November 18, 2015, and randomized 1:1 in a masked fashion to receive bevacizumab or aflibercept. At month 6, 348 participants (96%) had VA outcomes measured and 335 participants (93%) had spectral domain optical coherence tomography outcomes measured. The current data analysis was conducted from February 27, 2017, to April 7, 2017.
Interventions: Eyes were randomly assigned to receive an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab, 1.25 mg, or aflibercept, 2.0 mg, at baseline and every 4 weeks, with the primary outcome measured at 6 months.
Main outcomes and measures: Change from baseline in VA letter score (VALS), VALS gain of 15 or more, change from baseline in CST, CST less than 300 µm, and resolution of ME. Baseline factors associated with 6-month outcome at the 0.05 level in univariate regressions were included in multivariate regressions, with those significant after multiplicity control by the Hochberg method reported.
Results: The mean (SD) age of patients was 69 (12) years, and 43% were women. Younger patient age (odds ratio [OR], 0.95 per year of age; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98; P = .007) and lower baseline VALS (OR, 0.96 per letter; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98; P < .001) were associated with a 6-month VALS gain of 15 or greater. Compared with bevacizumab, aflibercept treatment was associated with a higher odds of ME resolution (OR, 3.59; 95% CI, 2.22-5.80; P < .001) and CST less than 300 µm (OR, 5.30; 95% CI, 2.40-11.67; P = .001), but not with a better VA outcome. Macular edema was less likely to resolve in eyes that received anti-VEGF treatment prior to study participation (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.64; P = .03).
Conclusions and relevance: In eyes treated with bevacizumab or aflibercept, younger age and worse baseline VALS were associated with better 6-month VA outcomes. Aflibercept treatment was associated with more favorable spectral domain optical coherence tomography outcomes but not VA outcomes. These findings may be useful in assessing expected response at month 6 after monthly injection of anti-VEGF agents for treating ME due to CRVO and HRVO.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01969708.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
-
Comparing Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 1;135(6):649-650. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1142. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28492822 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Month 24 Outcomes After Treatment Initiation With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Macular Edema Due to Central Retinal or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion: SCORE2 Report 10: A Secondary Analysis of the SCORE2 Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 1;137(12):1389-1398. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3947. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31600368 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes After Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Macular Edema in Participants With Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion Compared With Participants With Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) Report 18.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 May 1;140(5):458-464. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.0352. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35323843 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Monthly vs Treat-and-Extend Regimens for Individuals With Macular Edema Who Respond Well to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Medications: Secondary Outcomes From the SCORE2 Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr 1;136(4):337-345. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6843. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29476687 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 7;7(7):CD009510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009510.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32633861 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between Ozurdex and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for retinal vein occlusion-related macular edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;67(11):1800-1809. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_382_19. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31638037 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
SCORE2 Report 20: Relationship of Treatment Discontinuation With Visual Acuity and Central Subfield Thickness Outcomes.Am J Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr;248:157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.12.026. Epub 2022 Dec 28. Am J Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36584835 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative Efficacy of Pharmacotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Network Meta-analysis.Front Pharmacol. 2021 Dec 8;12:752048. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.752048. eCollection 2021. Front Pharmacol. 2021. PMID: 34955825 Free PMC article.
-
Pre-treatment clinical features in central retinal vein occlusion that predict visual outcome following intravitreal ranibizumab.BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb 9;18(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0701-x. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29426292 Free PMC article.
-
Two-Week Central Macular Thickness Reduction Rate >37% Predicts the Long-Term Efficacy of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 7;9:851238. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.851238. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35355596 Free PMC article.
-
Potential Prognostic Indicators for Patients With Retinal Vein Occlusion.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 25;9:839082. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.839082. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35692537 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Scott IU, VanVeldhuisen PC, Ip MS, et al. ; SCORE2 Investigator Group . Effect of bevacizumab vs aflibercept on visual acuity among patients with macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion: the SCORE2 randomized clinical trial [published online May 9, 2017]. JAMA. doi:10.1001/JAMA.2017.4568 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- World Medical Association World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194. - PubMed
-
- Beck RW, Moke PS, Turpin AH, et al. . A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(2):194-205. - PubMed
-
- Hochberg Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika. 1988;75:800-802.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous