Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Jul;117(7):1403-1411.
doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3631-z. Epub 2017 May 10.

Ambulatory blood pressure response to a bout of HIIT in metabolic syndrome patients

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Ambulatory blood pressure response to a bout of HIIT in metabolic syndrome patients

M Ramirez-Jimenez et al. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: The effectiveness of exercise to lower blood pressure may depend on the type and intensity of exercise. We study the short-term (i.e., 14-h) effects of a bout of high-intensity aerobic interval training (HIIT) on blood pressure in metabolic syndrome (MetS) patients.

Methods: Nineteen MetS patients (55.2 ± 7.3 years, 6 women) entered the study. Eight of them were normotensive and eleven hypertensive according to MetS threshold (≥130 mmHg for SBP and/or ≥85 mmHg for DBP). In the morning of 3 separated days, they underwent a cycling exercise bout of HIIT (>90% of maximal heart rate, ~85% VO2max), or a bout of isocaloric moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT; ~70% of maximal heart rate, ~60% VO2max), or a control no-exercise trial (REST). After exercise, ambulatory blood pressure (ABP; 14 h) was monitored, while subjects continued their habitual daily activities wearing a wrist-band activity monitor.

Results: No ABP differences were found for normotensive subjects. In hypertensive subjects, systolic ABP was reduced by 6.1 ± 2.2 mmHg after HIIT compared to MICT and REST (130.8 ± 3.9 vs. 137.4 ± 5.1 and 136.4 ± 3.8 mmHg, respectively; p < 0.05). However, diastolic ABP was similar in all three trials (77.2 ± 2.6 vs. 78.0 ± 2.6 and 78.9 ± 2.8 mmHg, respectively). Motion analysis revealed no differences among trials during the 14-h.

Conclusion: This study suggests that the blood pressure reducing effect of a bout of exercise is influence by the intensity of exercise. A HIIT exercise bout is superior to an equivalent bout of continuous exercise when used as a non-pharmacological aid in the treatment of hypertension in MetS.

Keywords: Ambulatory blood pressure; High intensity interval training; Hypertension; Metabolic syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Hypertens. 2014 Mar;32(3):480-3 - PubMed
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984 Jun;16(3):207-15 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Oct;104(3):481-9 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Dec;97(6):2071-6 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 6;58(11):1165-73 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources